Hi!
Did you Bcc backports-users on intention? Why so?
* [2009-09-07 17:36:47 CEST]:
> am 7 Sep schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > a) This BTS is not for backport bugs.
> >
> > Thankfully you didn't actually report a bug.
>
> I use the "contact" at the bottom of the page
> "packages.debian.o
Package: openoffice.org-presentation-minimizer
Version: 1.0+OOo2.4.0-3
Severity: minor
Hi!
The long description of openoffice.org-presentation-minimizer is pretty
unfriendly to description renderers:
#v+
Description: OpenOffice.org Presentation Minimizer extension
OpenOffice.org is a f
Package: hunspell
Version: 1.1.4-1
Severity: important
Hi!
Somehow it isn't possible to install hunspell-de-at or hunspell-de-de
when hunspell is installed:
#v+
$> grep-available -FPackage -X hunspell -sDepends
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0.2), libncurses5 (>= 5.4-5),
Package: dmake
Version: 4.2+cvs20031009-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
The long description of dmake is a little bit puzzling:
This utility has an irregular syntax but is available for Linux,
Solaris, and Win32 and other platforms. This version of dmake is
a modified version of th
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-24 09:45]:
> Now that we have the PTS (package tracking system), it is possible for us to
> subscribe to bug reports as if the packge were in Debian already.
Ah, didn't know of that Bu^WFeature of the PTS yet. Seems to be nice.
Please ignore my request,
* Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-21 09:15]:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1.0.0-4
> Severity: normal
Please notice that openoffice.org is *not* part of Debian (yet) so you
should not use the BTS to report bugs. Rather mail the mailinglist
directly.
Have fun,
Alfie
--
Außer
Hi!
Uhm, Chris, why not having done the following three commits in one?
Just curious. Same log message for all of them...
* Debian Openoffice CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-13 03:02]:
> Repository: oo-deb/debian
> who:haggai
> time: Thu Jun 13 10:02:42 UTC 2002
> Log M
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-13 11:29]:
> CVS has the contents of the debian directory. I suggest you first get the
> source package and replace the debian directory with the one from CVS:
>
> apt-get source openoffice.org
> cd openoffice.org-1.0.0
> rm -rf debian
> export CVSROOT=
* Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-30 15:07]:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri 31 May 2002 11:25:39 CEST) --]
gpg: Signature made Thu 30 May 2002 15:07:07 CEST using DSA key ID 331FFF66
gpg: DSA requires the use of a 160 bit hash algorithm
gpg: Can't check signature: general
* Shree Raman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-29 16:04]:
> I was taking options :: local installation,
> installation directory :: /root/OpenOffice.org1.0
Do *NEVER EVER* work as root. root is the admin account and is not
there to run big fat asses like openoffice. It's for sysadmin things
only.
Hi!
I'm not sure if I just deleted the original or if I haven't got it,
anyway
* Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-28 00:35]:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 12:10:09PM -0300, Altamir Dias wrote:
>>For Debian dists - woody users.
>>
>>Change the following files:
>>
>>1) In th
* Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-25 14:17]:
> The package is called oooqs and requires KDE3 (http://calc.cx/kde.txt).
Would be nice if you could package it with the kde packages that are
available in woody or unstable. Or does it really require kde3 itself?
Uhm, no chance to test it the
* Peter Novodvorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-23 13:46]:
> I'm Cc'ing this to debian-openoffice, people out there know these problems and
> workarounds better then me.
>
> ++ 23/05/02 11:21 +0200 - S?bastien Lefebvre:
>> I then added the apt source in order to get the Deb package. But when
>> i
* Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-16 11:22]:
> # Fix some variable to make the paths shorter in the rest
> oohome="$HOME/.openoffice"
> lingfile="$oohome/user/config/registry/instance/org/openoffice/Office/Linguistic.xml"
> setupfile="$oohome/user/config/registry/instance/org/openoffice
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 12:44]:
[903_remove_mailcap_mime.types_handling.diff]
> Cool, thanks a lot :) I'll try it next time I'm rebuilding completely.
>
> The mime stuff is already done, thanks to John Cooper - I made a packaging
> mistake with it. Just run update-mime as r
* Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 11:37]:
> That should be all the magic needed. I now grepped through the source
> and found that in
> build-tree/oo_1.0_src/setup2/source/custom/regmimetypes/regmimetypes.cxx
> line 93 .mailcap defines FILE_NAME_MAILCAP. N
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 11:26]:
> Sorry, typo on my part - I meant Mail-Followup-To :) and now my mutt gets
> the To/Cc right by itself, thanks.
Well, not needed anymore, I'm now subscribed *gg*
>> Uhm, don't think that that would be a good idea. Could lead to security
>>
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-13 16:14]:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> Thanks for the Cc, don't forget it next time, too :)
>
> :) Have you heard of the Reply-To: header? That does just what you want.
Yes, but t
Hi again!
Thanks for the Cc, don't forget it next time, too :)
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-13 14:47]:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:42:58PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> openoffice registers itself in ~/.mailcap -- at the *start*. Would be
>>
Hi!
Jan encouraged me to mail you directly :) I stumbled upon some things
that I noticed that I'd like to share with you. First of all, I'm not
subscribed to the list so please Cc me on replies that aren't about only
internal hick-hack ,)
openoffice registers itself in ~/.mailcap -- a
20 matches
Mail list logo
