Rene Engelhard dixit:
> You as DD should know that stable won't get any updates for this anymore. (And
> it will be oldstable in a short time anyway, even.)
So, who cares?
> So reporting this against stable does not make any sense at all.
It does: it records the issue, so others will know, and
Package: libreoffice-writer
Version: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u6
Followup-For: Bug #965236
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
This is still pertinent (tested by extracting the font with
mutool then loading the resulting .pfa in FontForge).
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.7
Package: libreoffice-writer
Version: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u6
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Using the attached font (yes, libre licences) in a document
then either exporting that to PDF or printing it to a file
results in output that cannot directly be printed.
To add
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Maybe time to get hardware from this or last century even?
Excuse me! That’s so totally not acceptable.
Debian runs on such machines, and I personally also have an EeePC,
and, to reduce electronic waste, reusing of older machines is
perfectly fine.
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.0.4-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
With the following ~/.Xmodmap as my keyboard layout…
http://www.mirbsd.org/cvs.cgi/contrib/samples/dot.Xmodmap?rev=1.24.4.15;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag=grml
… on a PC/Thinkpad keyboard, observe
Rene Engelhard dixit:
[…]
>seamless continuity from the 6.4 version to the 7.0."
Thanks for the update! Feel free to close this any time you want.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
I want one of these. They cost 720 € though… good they don’t have the HD hole,
which indicates 3½″ floppies with double
Hi Rene,
>[ I actually excpected a bug report like this earlier, not only after >
>1 week ;-) ]
I rarely use this software, so… ☺
[…]
>So IMHO not a big deal.
[… lots of explanation …]
OK, thanks for the verbose explanation and that you’re “on it”.
Package: libreoffice-writer
Version: 1:7.0.0~rc1-5
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
When LibreOffice exports into a PDF with embedding and subsetting fonts,
the remaining PDFs do not contain the fonts’ copyright notices and
licence terms. This may violate the licence of some fonts,
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.0.0~rc1-5
Severity: minor
LibreOffice 7 presents itself proudly, in its splash screen,
and in the bottom-left corner of the start centre, as…
Personal Edition
… and the About dialogue says:
The Personal edition is supported by volunteers and
Package: ure
Version: 6.4.0~rc1-5
Followup-For: Bug #947907
It’s more than just libjuh-java:
$ sudo dpkg -i --force-all /var/cache/apt/archives/ure_6.4.0~rc1-5_amd64.deb
(Reading database ... 429920 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../ure_6.4.0~rc1-5_amd64.deb ...
reopen 947488
found 947488 1:6.4.0~rc1-2
thanks
Debian Bug Tracking System dixit:
>This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
>which was filed against the libreoffice-common package:
>
>#947488: libreoffice-common: Error in /usr/share/doc-base/access2base', line
>7: all
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 1:6.4.0~rc1-2
Severity: normal
Processing triggers for doc-base (0.10.9) ...
Processing 2 changed doc-base files, 1 added doc-base file...
Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/access2base', line 7: all `Format' sections are
invalid.
Note: `install-docs --verbose
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 1:6.4.0~rc1-2
Severity: minor
Why does it depend on *two* themes? This should probably be something like
Depends: libreoffice-style-colibre | libreoffice-style-tango | libreoffice-style
where libreoffice-style could be a virtual package Provided by all other
18-03-11 13:22:48.0 +0100
+++ graphite2-1.3.11/debian/changelog 2018-08-01 17:39:17.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+graphite2 (1.3.11-2+x32.1) unreleased; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix x32 being misdetected as amd64 in tests. (Closes: #884190)
+
+ -- Thorsten Glas
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, r...@debian.org wrote:
> > It's said that such requirement (">") is likely to be a mistake. Is
> > this a problem?
>
> No, it's not.
It normally is, you use either ">=" or ">>".
bye,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜ Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
Rene Engelhard dixit:
>Why reporting on this ooold version?
Apparently, nullmailer in schroot requires a dæmon to actually
send mails to the postfix running on localhost. I have to find
out a different way to send mails from a chroot. sendmail, probably.
Those were old bugreports, but I had to
Package: libreoffice-calc
Version: 1:5.1.4~rc2-2
Severity: important
LibreOffice Calc violates the CSV specification in two ways.
One (see the attached mwe1.csv): if a string field ends with a
backslash, the terminating double quote is taken to be part of
the cell content.
Screenshots:
•
Rene Engelhard dixit:
Actually no, it's not. And it has some RC bugs right now even from
quickly looking at it
Thanks for looking at it, still.
- Depends: openoffice.org-common
for Writer. Please depend on writer. (which in turn depends on -common
anyway)
Okay. I only looked for which
Rene Engelhard dixit:
But what I do like is the missing preinst and doing the unregistering
in prerm.
Saves us pre-dependencies...
Thanks ;)
I mostly do packaging by adapting existing packages (especially these
I’m familiar with – like mksh) to the needs of the new one, peeking at
how other
19 matches
Mail list logo
