Hi.
Alex Romosan wrote:
> Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > WTF? did you not reopen the old bug but file a new one?
>
> sorry, i get really annoyed when people close a bug without actually
> fixing it (and in this case introducing it since it wasn't there
gar. Get a clue. We ment
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> WTF? did you not reopen the old bug but file a new one?
sorry, i get really annoyed when people close a bug without actually
fixing it (and in this case introducing it since it wasn't there
before, at least for i386). isn't this the "debian way"? :-(
reopen 293351
merge 293351 295900
thanks
Alex Romosan wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-bin
> Version: 1.1.3-5
> Severity: important
>
> bug #293551 complained about the same thing and it got closed with the
> following explanation: build gnomevfs library sanely. obviously this
> is not corect as
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.1.3-5
Severity: important
bug #293551 complained about the same thing and it got closed with the
following explanation: build gnomevfs library sanely. obviously this
is not corect as the package suddenly (at least on i386) depends on
gnome libraries. please f
4 matches
Mail list logo