On 8/6/18 11:54 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 05:50:35PM +0300, Vincas Dargis wrote:
BTW I have proposed update to use `dri-enumerate` abstraction and remove
backported rule:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/58589/
As I said upstream I am not sure about this upstream.
B
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 05:50:35PM +0300, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> intrigeri, could we get opencl abstractions in 2.13, or we are expecting to
> get AppArmor 3 in Buster?
>
> BTW I have proposed update to use `dri-enumerate` abstraction and remove
> backported rule:
> https://gerrit.libreoffi
On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 23:21:19 +0800 intrigeri wrote:
> BTW I have proposed update to use `dri-enumerate` abstraction and remove
backported rule:
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/58589/
If I'm supposed to act on this, please clarify what I should do,
otherwise ignore this sentence.
Sorry f
Vincas Dargis:
> intrigeri, could we get opencl abstractions in 2.13, or we are expecting to
> get AppArmor 3 in Buster?
Sure, gimme a bug against src:apparmor :)
> BTW I have proposed update to use `dri-enumerate` abstraction and remove
> backported rule:
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/5
intrigeri, could we get opencl abstractions in 2.13, or we are expecting to get
AppArmor 3 in Buster?
BTW I have proposed update to use `dri-enumerate` abstraction and remove
backported rule:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/58589/
On 3/4/18 1:52 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Tools->Options-OpenCL. Though that setting doesn't persist here,
probably because LO notices I don't have a working OpenCL config..
After some testing, it seems that OpenCL option persist for me only if I
launch LO through `optirun` command, that enable
On 3/4/18 1:52 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 03:10:45PM +0200, Vincas Dargis wrote:
I'm on switching laptop (Intel + NVIDIA). Maybe I have to enable OpenCL for
Libreoffice somehow?
Tools->Options-OpenCL. Though that setting doesn't persist here,
probably because LO notices
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 03:10:45PM +0200, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:48:06 -0700 Thomas Vaughan
> wrote:
> > I see that this bug is closed, but I see something similar in my
> > system log. I am running Debian unstable updated as of yesterday. It
> > seems that libreoffic
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:48:06 -0700 Thomas Vaughan
wrote:
I see that this bug is closed, but I see something similar in my
system log. I am running Debian unstable updated as of yesterday. It
seems that libreoffice is trying to make use of OpenCL, and I have a
couple of OpenCL ICDs installed.
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 04:11:46PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > cert8 and key3, not cert9 and key4...
>
> Answering myself. Seems key4.db is firefox >= 58...
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783994
>
> So pro
tag 887593 - moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 04:11:46PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> cert8 and key3, not cert9 and key4...
Answering myself. Seems key4.db is firefox >= 58...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783994
So probably we need to allow both...
Regards,
Rene
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 887593 + moreinfo
Bug #887593 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice-common]
libreoffice-common: apparmor profiles triggers lot of ALLOWED entries
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
tag 887593 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:08:15PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Feb 15 17:42:26 foo-machine kernel: [85563.650059] audit: type=1400
> > audit(1518741746.405:442): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open"
> > profile="libreoffice-soffice"
> > name="/home/tevaugha/.m
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 08:05:26PM +0200, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> I guess we need yet another abstraction to prepare :) . I could search for
Yeah. And update the kde one...
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=b13678b1e1d6f4cac548ae7e088b6030c31cf081
(for 6.1)
> > w?
> >
On 2/16/18 8:08 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 08:48:06AM -0700, Thomas Vaughan wrote:
Feb 15 17:41:31 foo-machine kernel: [85508.697711] kauditd_printk_skb:
8 callbacks suppressed
Feb 15 17:41:31 foo-machine kernel: [85508.697712] audit: type=1400
audit(1518741691.452:20): ap
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 08:48:06AM -0700, Thomas Vaughan wrote:
> I see that this bug is closed, but I see something similar in my
> system log. I am running Debian unstable updated as of yesterday. It
> seems that libreoffice is trying to make use of OpenCL, and I have a
> couple of OpenCL ICDs
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:08:15PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Feb 15 17:42:26 foo-machine kernel: [85563.650059] audit: type=1400
> > audit(1518741746.405:442): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open"
> > profile="libreoffice-soffice"
> > name="/home/tevaugha/.mozilla/firefox/giv84ecf.default/cer
I see that this bug is closed, but I see something similar in my
system log. I am running Debian unstable updated as of yesterday. It
seems that libreoffice is trying to make use of OpenCL, and I have a
couple of OpenCL ICDs installed.
After opening a PDF file in LibreOffice Draw, I saw the foll
18 matches
Mail list logo