Re: Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-05 Thread Stanley Peng
Hi Rene, When I build ooo 2.0.0-2 with debianSarge, the following erros occurd: dmake: Error -- `./unxlngi4.pro/misc/neon-0.24.7.unpack' not found, and can't be made thx. Stanley Peng

Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Jérôme Warnier
[..] > I have yet another problem later, which is due to my build taking place > in a x86 chroot on and AMD64 Debian. If someone has got an idea about it > or wants more info... Otherwise, don't worry, I will try to sort this > out myself. Utility "linux32" sorted it all for me. It is similar to "

Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > [..] > > Another thing: in debian/control(.in), the package build-depends on some > packages of libraries from Xorg (which is obviously not in Sarge), like > libxinerama-dev and libxkbfile-dev. > So, shouldn't the "libxinerama-dev, libxkbfile-dev" read instead > "libxi

Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Jérôme Warnier
[..] Another thing: in debian/control(.in), the package build-depends on some packages of libraries from Xorg (which is obviously not in Sarge), like libxinerama-dev and libxkbfile-dev. So, shouldn't the "libxinerama-dev, libxkbfile-dev" read instead "libxinerama-dev | xlibs-dev, libxkbfile-dev |

Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 00:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard a écrit : > Hi, > > Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > > Which is broken, too. Are we Ubuntu? no. we are Debian so the sarge > > > clause has to be in the Debian clause otherwise it has no effect because > > > on Debian the Debian clause will be used

Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > Which is broken, too. Are we Ubuntu? no. we are Debian so the sarge > > clause has to be in the Debian clause otherwise it has no effect because > > on Debian the Debian clause will be used. Always. > No, look carefully, I put it in the else clause of the 'ifeq "$(DIS

Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 22:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard a écrit : > Hi, > > Jerome Warnier wrote: > > > b) you remove ENABLE_HUNSPELL? Why? And you really want to use internal > > > hunspell to not have to backport other packages than OOo. You just need > > > to add the hunspell package to ooo-

Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > b) you remove ENABLE_HUNSPELL? Why? And you really want to use internal > > hunspell to not have to backport other packages than OOo. You just need > > to add the hunspell package to ooo-build/src. What I incidentially > > forgot in 2.0.0-2 so it doesn't appear in the

Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Jerome Warnier
Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 21:54 +0100, Rene Engelhard a écrit : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Jerome Warnier wrote: > > Please find here-attached a patch to debian/rules (from version 2.0.0-2) > > to fix some problems and even do some extra. > > It is pretty s

Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Jerome Warnier wrote: > Please find here-attached a patch to debian/rules (from version 2.0.0-2) > to fix some problems and even do some extra. > It is pretty small and quickly read/checked so please get back to me if > any problem. a) system-icu

OOo2 backport to Sarge

2005-11-04 Thread Jerome Warnier
Please find here-attached a patch to debian/rules (from version 2.0.0-2) to fix some problems and even do some extra. It is pretty small and quickly read/checked so please get back to me if any problem. Hope it helps. -- Jérôme Warnier FLOSS Consultant http://beeznest.net rules.patch.gz Descrip