./packages/openofficeorg/3.0/experimental r1071: eh, no, this one..

2008-05-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 1071 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Tue 2008-05-06 12:13:54 +0200 message: eh, no, this one.. modified: control.in === modified file 'control.in' --- a/control.in

r794 ./packages/openofficeorg/2.2.1/unstable: eh, this actually should hardcode he

2007-07-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
revno: 794 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Mon 2007-07-30 23:01:50 +0200 message: eh, this actually should hardcode he modified: changelog rules === modified file 'chang

Re: eh?

2003-09-05 Thread Agustin Martin Domingo
Rene Engelhard wrote: huh? What the fuck? What do you mean with that? The openoffice.org packages has support for myspell-* now? Or do you mean upstream support for Galician? Yes If I am not wrong there is still need of black magic (associating the dict to an existing entry that is not use

eh?

2003-09-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, > Retitling package name. Still waiting for openoffice.org to have > support for it, but will be uploaded as soon as mozilla-spellchecker huh? What the fuck? What do you mean with that? The openoffice.org packages has support for myspell-* now? Or do you mean upstream support for Galician?