Re: two OOo orig.tar.gzs?

2006-03-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > > care to explain, in which way? > > I don't know for sure of course, but what if the help gets out of sync > with the binaries? What will happen when you have help that doesn't > match the binaries of OO.o, and especially, having help that was build > >fro

Re: two OOo orig.tar.gzs?

2006-03-01 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:48:34PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: > > Hm, duplicate sources seem like quite a hack to me, > > really? for other sources they were requested by the release > team. or do you mean "it depends ..." Yeah, it depends definitely. I'm not wel

Re: two OOo orig.tar.gzs?

2006-03-01 Thread Matthias Klose
Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: > Hm, duplicate sources seem like quite a hack to me, really? for other sources they were requested by the release team. or do you mean "it depends ..." > and a potentially fragile at that. care to explain, in which way? > The bottom line seems to be that OO.o has

Re: two OOo orig.tar.gzs?

2006-02-28 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > now that the OpenOffice.org help is buildable with free Java (gcj/gij) I > want to move it to main (it's currently in contrib because it to now it > needed non-free jars and Sun/Blackdown/IBM Java to build. > > But there's some fund

two OOo orig.tar.gzs?

2006-02-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, now that the OpenOffice.org help is buildable with free Java (gcj/gij) I want to move it to main (it's currently in contrib because it to now it needed non-free jars and Sun/Blackdown/IBM Java to build. But there's some fundamental problem here: