Hi,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > care to explain, in which way?
>
> I don't know for sure of course, but what if the help gets out of sync
> with the binaries? What will happen when you have help that doesn't
> match the binaries of OO.o, and especially, having help that was build
> >fro
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:48:34PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes:
> > Hm, duplicate sources seem like quite a hack to me,
>
> really? for other sources they were requested by the release
> team. or do you mean "it depends ..."
Yeah, it depends definitely. I'm not wel
Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes:
> Hm, duplicate sources seem like quite a hack to me,
really? for other sources they were requested by the release
team. or do you mean "it depends ..."
> and a potentially fragile at that.
care to explain, in which way?
> The bottom line seems to be that OO.o has
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> now that the OpenOffice.org help is buildable with free Java (gcj/gij) I
> want to move it to main (it's currently in contrib because it to now it
> needed non-free jars and Sun/Blackdown/IBM Java to build.
>
> But there's some fund
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
now that the OpenOffice.org help is buildable with free Java (gcj/gij) I
want to move it to main (it's currently in contrib because it to now it
needed non-free jars and Sun/Blackdown/IBM Java to build.
But there's some fundamental problem here:
5 matches
Mail list logo