Re: new policy topic --- syslog() [was Re: syslog facilities]

1998-02-12 Thread KELEMEN Peter
On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, Adam P. Harris wrote: > Sure, but I think we could keep our thoughts at the level of "what would > you think is reasonable out of the box". There's a lot of generality; > the baseline and de facto "policy" is what ships w/ sysklogd. AFAIR sysklogd doesn't have any suggestio

Re: what to do with `namespace-pollution'

1998-02-12 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 08:22:08PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: > > "MB" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > MB: There is no need to keep a silly choosen upstream name. We > MB: change a lot of things defined upstream (file location, etc), > MB: and I don't think tha