Re: Bug reporting proceedure, was Re: Bug#24066: libc6: rsh segfaults as , a result of new libc 2.0.7r2

1998-06-30 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 30 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > >>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dale> I never said "demand" anything. I am talking about "higher > Dale> education" for users, not binding them to a post in the town > Dale> square and giving them 20 lashes. > > ;-

Re: Bug reporting proceedure, was Re: Bug#24066: libc6: rsh segfaults as , a result of new libc 2.0.7r2

1998-06-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dale> I never said "demand" anything. I am talking about "higher Dale> education" for users, not binding them to a post in the town Dale> square and giving them 20 lashes. ;-) Well said. I agree with this post, completely. (If yo

Re: Bug reporting proceedure, was Re: Bug#24066: libc6: rsh segfaults as , a result of new libc 2.0.7r2

1998-06-30 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 30 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > >>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dale> On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > >> Umm, no. It would be nice if they did it, but a novce user is > >> perfectly free to just file a bug report. I know I often do. I find

Re: Bug reporting proceedure, was Re: Bug#24066: libc6: rsh segfaults as , a result of new libc 2.0.7r2

1998-06-30 Thread Ed Cogburn
Dale Scheetz wrote: > > On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > Hi, > > >>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Rob> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> What I am requesting is that the submitter of a bug take some time, in > > >> exchange for the time the

Re: Bug reporting proceedure, was Re: Bug#24066: libc6: rsh segfaults as , a result of new libc 2.0.7r2

1998-06-30 Thread Adam P. Harris
Geeze, the crossposting is horrendous. I don't see this as a policy issue, so followups to debian-devel or debian-user only please. Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Make bug reporting any more onerous than it is, and peole > > merely sto

Re: Bug reporting proceedure, was Re: Bug#24066: libc6: rsh segfaults as , a result of new libc 2.0.7r2

1998-06-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dale> On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Umm, no. It would be nice if they did it, but a novce user is >> perfectly free to just file a bug report. I know I often do. I find >> an error, usually that by itself is a frustrating e

Re: Bug reporting proceedure, was Re: Bug#24066: libc6: rsh segfaults as , a result of new libc 2.0.7r2

1998-06-30 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > >>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Rob> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> What I am requesting is that the submitter of a bug take some time, in > >> exchange for the time they expect from the maintainer, and veri

Re: Bug reports and the Maintainer feild

1998-06-30 Thread Jules Bean
--On Mon, Jun 29, 1998 5:59 pm -0700 "Ben Gertzfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jason> I'm certain we don't need another alias for this list :> > > Jason> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] All > Jason> of th

Re: Bug reports and the Maintainer feild

1998-06-30 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jason> I'm certain we don't need another alias for this list :> Jason> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Jason> of the documentation uses [EMAIL PROTECTED] Okay. To verify, we want to: * Change the 'Maintaine

Re: Bug reports and the Maintainer feild

1998-06-30 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On 29 Jun 1998, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > > "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jason> Unfortunately you cliped out the rest of the message, > Jason> specificly the part where I said Joey has installed an > Jason> override so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] always goe

Re: Bug reporting proceedure, was Re: Bug#24066: libc6: rsh segfaults as , a result of new libc 2.0.7r2

1998-06-30 Thread Rob Browning
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Make bug reporting any more onerous than it is, and peole > merely stop filing reports. I suppose there is something to that. > For the most part the maintainer knows the bugs on a package > better than anyone else, and the maintainers

Re: Bug reporting proceedure, was Re: Bug#24066: libc6: rsh segfaults as , a result of new libc 2.0.7r2

1998-06-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rob> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What I am requesting is that the submitter of a bug take some time, in >> exchange for the time they expect from the maintainer, and verify that the >> bug has not been reported already. If