On 30 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dale> I never said "demand" anything. I am talking about "higher
> Dale> education" for users, not binding them to a post in the town
> Dale> square and giving them 20 lashes.
>
> ;-
Hi,
>>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dale> I never said "demand" anything. I am talking about "higher
Dale> education" for users, not binding them to a post in the town
Dale> square and giving them 20 lashes.
;-) Well said. I agree with this post, completely. (If yo
On 30 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dale> On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> >> Umm, no. It would be nice if they did it, but a novce user is
> >> perfectly free to just file a bug report. I know I often do. I find
Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > >>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Rob> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> What I am requesting is that the submitter of a bug take some time, in
> > >> exchange for the time the
Geeze, the crossposting is horrendous. I don't see this as a policy
issue, so followups to debian-devel or debian-user only please.
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Make bug reporting any more onerous than it is, and peole
> > merely sto
Hi,
>>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dale> On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Umm, no. It would be nice if they did it, but a novce user is
>> perfectly free to just file a bug report. I know I often do. I find
>> an error, usually that by itself is a frustrating e
On 29 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rob> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> What I am requesting is that the submitter of a bug take some time, in
> >> exchange for the time they expect from the maintainer, and veri
--On Mon, Jun 29, 1998 5:59 pm -0700 "Ben Gertzfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jason> I'm certain we don't need another alias for this list :>
>
> Jason> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] All
> Jason> of th
> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jason> I'm certain we don't need another alias for this list :>
Jason> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] All
Jason> of the documentation uses [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay. To verify, we want to:
* Change the 'Maintaine
On 29 Jun 1998, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jason> Unfortunately you cliped out the rest of the message,
> Jason> specificly the part where I said Joey has installed an
> Jason> override so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] always goe
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Make bug reporting any more onerous than it is, and peole
> merely stop filing reports.
I suppose there is something to that.
> For the most part the maintainer knows the bugs on a package
> better than anyone else, and the maintainers
Hi,
>>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What I am requesting is that the submitter of a bug take some time, in
>> exchange for the time they expect from the maintainer, and verify that the
>> bug has not been reported already. If
12 matches
Mail list logo