Hello.
This is my initial document I want the discussion to base on. If you
consider parts of this to be controversial for you, you are welcome to
participate and discuss the content on the Debian policy list,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please follow up only to debian-policy. Thank you,
Marcus
Data Enti
On 07-Aug-98 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I propose we select/install a group of people who have access to the
> CVS repository for the Policy documents; however, this set of people
> behave more like maintainers rather than authors/editors. This group
> does not create policy, not
Hi,
This is my formal proposal for the Debian policy
documents. Though this is being sent to beoth the -devel and the
-policy lists, discussions of this proposal really belong on the
policy lists, so please send comments to debian-policy@lists.debian.org
(You do not need to be subscrib
On 7 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Martin> b) A set of web pages covering recent topics has to be set
> Martin> up and maintained. This could be master/~srivasta/ since
> Martin> it's not "that" official but could also be somewhere on
> Martin> the main server. [or use a d
Hi,
>>"Martin" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> a) A weekly status has to be posted to debian-policy.
Hmm, I guess the weekly report I proposed posted to
debian-devel can also be sent to debian-policy. Done.
Martin> b) A set of web pages covering recent topics h
On 7 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> However, I do not think that standards documents (and
> possibly other categories [personal opinions come to mind]) benefit
> from being modifiable. In fact, making a modifiable document a
> standard undermines the validity and acceptance of the s
Hi,
I think I agree with parts of this, as far as they go, as long
as it pertains to *technical documentation* of software, in which
case, if I am permitted to modify the code, I can see why I should be
permitted to modify the documentation to describe the changes in
behaviour. So, I c
On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I also like this proposal but I don't volunteer, some jobs should
> not be connected to me ;-)
>
> However I'd like to add:
>
> a) A weekly status has to be posted to debian-policy.
>
> b) A set of web pages covering recent topics has to be set
>
It's probably worth adding that since RMS had his high-profile 'attack' on
a man wearing an O'Reilly T-shirt, O'Reilly have come to consider the
issues.
The mod_perl book, I believe, will have at least one chapter free. Whilst
this is not yet 'there', it's a foot in the door (www.modperl.com).
I
I also like this proposal but I don't volunteer, some jobs should
not be connected to me ;-)
However I'd like to add:
a) A weekly status has to be posted to debian-policy.
b) A set of web pages covering recent topics has to be set
up and maintained. This could be master/~srivasta/ since
Hi,
This is Richard Stallmans oppinion about free documentation.
It might be useful in our discussion of a free license for
documentation.
Regards,
Joey
--
There are lies, statistics and benchmarks.
--- Begin Message ---
[Please repost this wherever it is appropriate.]
A couple of wee
11 matches
Mail list logo
