Ian Jackson writes:
> What if we need or want to change the licence ? We need to have a fair
> way to _eventually_ stop people using it under the old licence, without
> inconveniencing them too much.
"This license expires one year from the date of publication of a new
license."
I don't really se
Joseph Carter writes ("PROPOSAL: Debian Logo (Was: Logo License has
*expired*)"):
...
> I propose that a new permanent license be given to the Debian Logo. While
> not a final draft certainly, I suggest the following license terms:
>
> * Logo may be used on "Official" CD-ROMs/jewel cases/etc
> *
Santiago Vila writes ("Re: /etc/adjtime, /etc/timezone, etc."):
...
> Of course it is possible. But the reason policy says some files should not
> be conffiles is the following: "Doing this will lead to dpkg giving the
> user confusing and possibly dangerous options for conffile update when the
> p
Buddha Buck writes ("Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Free Software Needs Free
Documentation] "):
> [Ian Jackson:]
> > I think I have a proposal for a condition to help identify
> > documentation which ought to be DFSG-free:
> >
> > If a document (or other work or part of one) is so closely connected
> > to
I've just read most of my 250-odd message backlog in debian-policy.
I have 12 articles marked to return, and will probably be posting
about those soon.
I want to reread the config management thread from the beginning,
though, and will then post again about it.
Sorry about the delay.
Ian.
Francesco Potorti` writes ("A problem with bash and a policy solution"):
...
> I propose that package maintainers are made aware of the problem and
> take some action against it.
I disagree most strongly.
This is a bug in bash, and as such should be fixed there. In the
meantime, people shoul
6 matches
Mail list logo
