there was a related discussion about origin field in deb,
so Debian produced debs would have origin SPI and others some
other
and how package tools (only apt, I think) would handle multiple
packages with the same name (would this affect also depends etc.
fields)
I think some guide line stuff was t
I just noticed the following planned but non-existent title in the
Debian Documentation Project's list of manuals:
How Software Producers can distribute their products directly in .deb
format
I thought a little about what might go in here, and realised that I
have not seen any guidance
Hi
>>"Bob" == Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while the
Bob> most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe there has
Bob> been agreement on the policy list that these documents would maintain
Bob> paralle
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That said, I'm in favour of dropping the Standards-Version field
> entirely. It adds no information, because it's generally not kept
> up to date, and even when it says "2.5.0" it doesn't mean that
> anyone checked it for compliance with the most rec
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while
> > the most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe
> > there has been agreement on the policy
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while
> > the most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe
> > there has been agreement on the policy list that these docum
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while
> the most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe
> there has been agreement on the policy list that these documents
> would maintain paralle
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I write documentation for Debian, it'll be in DocBook---and maybe
> my first project should be a nice introduction---but it seems like
> debiandoc-sgml is not the evolutionary dead end I had thought it to
> be.
Someone is going to shoot me for
8 matches
Mail list logo
