Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Should policy explicitly deprecate this methodology? I am
> inclined to think so, but I'm willing to be taught the error of my
> ways.
We already had this discussion on Debian-Java last year but did not find
a solution there. I also have a package that just cop
>>"Fabrizio" == Fabrizio Polacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Fabrizio> Hi, I was examining other's java packages searching for
Fabrizio> ideas when I noticed that this package has sources, but
Fabrizio> they are not used to produce the binary package; a
Fabrizio> precompiled stuff, also includ
Hi,
I was examining other's java packages searching for ideas when I noticed
that this package has sources, but they are not used to produce the
binary package; a precompiled stuff, also included in the original
package, is copyed into the binary.
That's it.
I felt this was a grave omission, and I
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 12:23:06AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> It's a bug report against lintian, not policy, but maybe it's
> something we should discuss and decide on this group anyway: should
> lintian report a warning for the use of undocumented(7)?
>
> (I note from rereading that Gecko seeme
4 matches
Mail list logo
