On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:50:15PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Trying to understand this directory structure (do I have this
> correct?):
>
> xyz-0.0/ [1]
> xyz-0.0/debian/ [2] could be symlink to source/debian [4]
> xyz-0.0/source/ [3] pristine source
Yep.
> tar
> "Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> [This is not about source package format.] Currently, the
Raul> debian/ directory goes inside the source directory, and we
Raul> sometimes can't use pristine upstream sources because they
Raul> don't conform to our stan
Hasty freezes cause missed deadlines. Three running trees of Stable,
Frozen, and Unstable would solve our release-length woes.
My reasoning follows:
We can never set a release date, and we don't have terribly specific
goals, we know. The answer of ``when it's ready'' might ring hollow to
the i
[This is not about source package format.]
Currently, the debian/ directory goes inside the source directory,
and we sometimes can't use pristine upstream sources because they don't
conform to our standards.
The obvious way to fix this is: have a standard for the debian source
directory, and unpa
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:56:37 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#79048: Virtual package: c++-compiler
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
5 matches
Mail list logo
