CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: srivastaWed Jan 17 23:44:41 PST 2001
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml upgrading-checklist.html
debian : changelog
Log message:
* The minimal change in version number is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 20373 [Pending Code] start-stop-service
Bug#20373: [PROPOSAL] shouldn't start init scripts in wrong runlevel
Changed Bug title.
severity 20373 fixed
Bug#20373: [Pending Code] start-stop-service
Severity set to `fixed'.
severity 27205 fixed
On 17-Jan-01, 23:28 (CST), Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does someone have an interest in pushing these proposals
through? What is needed is to have the skeleton code written by
Julian fleshed out, add support for file-rc, and then submitted as a
patch for the
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Does someone have an interest in pushing these proposals
through? What is needed is to have the skeleton code written by
Please have a look at policy proposal #76868 (invoke-rc.d). It has strong
ties to both #60979 (restart, maybe-restart)
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 17-Jan-01, 23:28 (CST), Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does someone have an interest in pushing these proposals
through? What is needed is to have the skeleton code written by
Julian fleshed out, add support for file-rc,
Installing:
debian-policy_3.2.1.2.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.2.1.2.dsc
debian-policy_3.2.1.2_all.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.2.1.2_all.deb
policy.text.gz byhand
policy.html.tar.gz byhand
menu-policy.text.gz byhand
debian-policy_3.2.1.2.tar.gz
to
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.2.1.0
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.sgml.gz
Tags: patch
--- policy.sgml.origThu Jan 18 18:09:53 2001
+++ policy.sgml Thu Jan 18 18:11:37 2001
@@ -3123,7 +3123,7 @@
sect
- headingMail transport
After reading Joey's latest DWN, I'm concerned about the possibility of
the merging of the non-us portion of Debian in to the main distribution.
I haven't tracked this list in the past so I wasn't aware of the
discussion until now.
In early December I attended a BoF session at the LISA sysadmin
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:47:32 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#55048: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:47:32 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#57154: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:47:32 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#59403: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:47:32 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#76028: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
debian-policy_3.2.1.2_all.deb: priority is overridden from optional to standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:47:32 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#51879: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:47:32 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#55730: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:47:32 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#66912: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:47:32 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#53496: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:47:32 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#53700: fixed in debian-policy 3.2.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
18 matches
Mail list logo
