[control] continuation lines on relation fields ?

2001-03-16 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Hi all, I've got an interpretation problem: can relationship fields be written on multiple lines ? Lintian (1.20.9) doesn't enforce them to be multi-line ; buildds seem to happily handle them. However, section 3.1 of the Policy (3.5.2) states "Except where otherwise stated only a single line o

Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)

2001-03-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:43:01PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, when I started this thread, I hadn't thought of this case. But > > I've now become convinced of the need to have a distinction between > > maintainer statoverrides, for cases like thi

Bug#89867: [PROPOSED] Where to place web-accessible images

2001-03-16 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist This is a follow-up to my message of 2001-03-11, where I proposed somewhere to put web accessible images. The background for this is that I have an open bug (# 61761) against mailman where the submitter complains about 'broken logo'. Which it is, becaus

Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)

2001-03-16 Thread Herbert Xu
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, when I started this thread, I hadn't thought of this case. But > I've now become convinced of the need to have a distinction between > maintainer statoverrides, for cases like this, and local > statoverrides, which take precedence. Not necessarily,