On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:18:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[you continue to CC me personally; is this some sort of sport for you?]
No, it's mutt's default behaviour. The previous message wasn't cc'ed to
you, anyway.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:24:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 04:49:45PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Additionally, I'd like to point out that two packages have already been
split out of tetex packages to correct this accident, texinfo[1] and
texi2html, and this hasn't caused any major problems (readjustment of a
couple of
Branden Robinson schrieb:
* the part of a package with X-specific components must have a priority no
higher than the packages on which it depends (including any X packages);
* an X-dependent alternative version of a package must have a priority no
higher than the packages on which it
On 25-Mar-01, 04:26 (CST), Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
If you create a must directive, then you've just created a reason to
have a number of extra RC bugs. Indeed, that's the only point of making
it a must instead of a should.
The point of making a must requirement is that the
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:09:15PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
Branden Robinson schrieb:
* the part of a package with X-specific components must have a priority no
higher than the packages on which it depends (including any X packages);
* an X-dependent alternative version of a package must
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[I read the policy mailing list; while you may feel your points are so
important that they merit my attention in my personal inbox, there is no
need to CC me.]
The headers of this message include:
Reply-To: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I just received a bug because lintian does not know about the section
'science'. Where is the canonical list of sections?
On 20010326T112130-0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
I just received a bug because lintian does not know about the section
'science'. Where is the canonical list of sections?
Basically, the set of valid sections is currently defined as whatever
sections exist in the master override database in
On 26-Mar-2001 Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On 20010326T112130-0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
I just received a bug because lintian does not know about the section
'science'. Where is the canonical list of sections?
Basically, the set of valid sections is currently defined as whatever
[CC'ing you, Bob, just to diagnose the problem]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:15:32AM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[I read the policy mailing list; while you may feel your points are so
important that they merit my attention in my personal inbox, there
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:00:40PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
I have two comments about the X font policy.
This is an excerpt from the policy:
5. Subdirectories of /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/ other than those
listed above should be neither created nor used. (The PEX and
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:00:40PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
The packages sharefont and freefont (they contain non-free fonts)
place the fonts in sharefont and freefont subdirectories. I think
that there is good reason about this -- we don't want to
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
Note that we don't have architecture-specific man page hierarchies as
mentioned in that section of the FHS. Incidentally, I think putting
those in /usr/share/man/i386 etc. is a misfeature - why not use
/usr/lib/man for programs only available on the
Title: 奇摩新聞-中央社休閒新聞照片
dkmibjrsrkjmoqlyqpc
國際電話每分鐘只要4元!!
歡迎免費試撥親身感受!!
歡迎惠顧網址:http://vip2000.tw.to/
A-固定式節費器(適用於公司企業):
加裝VIP2000節費器使用方式簡便.
14 matches
Mail list logo
