On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 11:04:34PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Anthony Towns wrote:
Or moving them into the task package themselves, but not in the control
record? Or shall we just forget I suggested that originally.
Well, I had.
Well, it's possible I wasn't explicit enough. What I said was:
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
I would like to propose ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin as names of virtual
packages which
ladspa-host: application capable of using ladspa-plugins to process audio data
ladspa-plugin: provides plug-in libraries in accordance to the ladspa
Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd rather that be the official mechanism so we can reduce the
number of dependency elemenets.
Sounds fair. What does dselect (in general, an apt front-end) when
there's no alternative with a higher priority? Wasn't that the reason
for the
Attached to this message is a tarball which contains a rather simple
program that uses debconf to present the user with a list of tasks
(sorted into groups). To try it, upgrade to debconf 0.9.53 (Incoming) [1],
unpack, and run newtasksel/tasksel -t newtasksel/tasklist
(or see [2] at the very end
4 matches
Mail list logo
