Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:42:28PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > UCS4 is not a satisfactory encoding for our needs, unfortunately.
> > JIS is not comlpete either, but UCS4 is less.
>
> Could you provide some examples of characters encoded in
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:29:51PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > I disagree with the idea that special symbols may only be used in
> > certain contexts. That's like saying that HTML should only be used
> > to describe the structure of a document and not its appearance --
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 a
Hi Steve!
You wrote:
> +
> +The web server should restrict access to the document
> +tree so that only clients on the same host can read
> +the documents. If the web server does not support such
> +access controls, then
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:29:51PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> I disagree with the idea that special symbols may only be used in
> certain contexts. That's like saying that HTML should only be used
> to describe the structure of a document and not its appearance --
Which is exactly correct. It
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.5.0
Severity: wishlist
In going over some ancient policy proposals, I came across #23661,
which proposed eliminating default http access to /usr/share/doc. The
conversation wandered off into the usual "we shouldn't have services
remotely accessible by default" d
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> > How can this person tell which kind of boldness is in use?
>
> mathematical symbols could use different typesetting convention
> (see latex)
But this should depend on mathematical context, not code point.
Or are you suggesting t
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:42:28PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> UCS4 is not a satisfactory encoding for our needs, unfortunately.
> JIS is not comlpete either, but UCS4 is less.
Could you provide some examples of characters encoded in JIS but not
in UCS4? [a url would be fine, if it's hard to r
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The full description of it is in the logs of bug#35049.
It's a bug in libc6-dev which has since been fixed. If you look at the
file libc_nonshared.a in slink, you'll find that the offending symbols
didn't have the .hidden flag while they do now.
> T
El Mar 12 Jun 2001 12:57, Wichert Akkerman escribió:
> Previously David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS wrote:
> > Well, I'd propose to make an addition to Policy and/or NM Guide:
>
> I propose to ignore this until Adam unveils the dpkg-source he is
> working on which will make this point moot.
Previously David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS wrote:
> Well, I'd propose to make an addition to Policy and/or NM Guide:
I propose to ignore this until Adam unveils the dpkg-source he is
working on which will make this point moot.
Wichert.
--
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 05:41:58AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > Let's imagine you're composing an html document. What's to prevent
> > > you from wrapping a mathematical alphanumeric character with ?
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:41:14AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> > that is a different k
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.5.0
Severity: wishlist
Hello. If you haven't followed the discussion in debian-devel:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0106/threads.html
Quoting Theodore Tso:
> One of the reasons why I wasn't particularly happy with Debian a
> number of years ago
> > Let's imagine you're composing an html document. What's to prevent
> > you from wrapping a mathematical alphanumeric character with ?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:41:14AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> that is a different kind of "boldness", used to emphasise
> bold mathematical symbols are di
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:38:21AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> And, there is no such letter as
> MATHEMATICAL BOLD CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER A, since
> cyrillic letters are normally not used in mathematic context.
Not bold, agreed, but Sha is used for the Shafarevic-Tate group in
number theory,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 03:40:29AM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.5.5.0
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Policy wants shared libraries to be in packages of names like libfoo6
> for a libfoo.so.6. However this becomes confusing if the library name
> ends in a number so t
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 03:07:25AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:38:21AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
...
>
> > You can make a text bold, and meaning will remain. If you make a
> > mathematical expression all bold, it will have a completely different
> > meaning.
>
> So?
> > > > Also, Unicode does include Fraktur characters.
> > >
> > > but in mathematical symbols - that is a completely different beast
> >
> > Please explain why it matters to the reader whether the letter A is
> > classifed by the unicode consortium as mathematical [or not]?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > I disagree. The Han Unification issue is more like the difference
> > > between the latin and the italic character sets. Yes, many characters
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 07:20:21PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> > No, because la
18 matches
Mail list logo
