Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts

2001-09-19 Thread Colin Watson
reassign 71621 debian-policy severity 71621 wishlist merge 71621 112828 thanks On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:06:16PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg Racke wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Severity: wishlist > > Please include an example how to use update-alternatives in the Debian > policy. Even reading the

Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary]

2001-09-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:57:38PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > I just got this on the vim-dev list. If this is indeed so (strip does > not work on s390) does that mean Debian policy forces us to have > large unstripped binaries on s390? Debian policy currently recommends that you only compi

OWN YOUR OWN SPORTSBOOK AND CASINO!

2001-09-19 Thread mervinsmith
Title: Untitled Document YOUR OWN INTERNET SPORTSBOOK & CASINOFOR $16,500!!! Internet Empire Entertainment. Has assembled and packaged the most cost effective turnkey program for you. The online gaming industry is expected to surpass 10 billion dollars in wagering by the year 2002. Let Interne

Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts

2001-09-19 Thread Steve Greenland
On 19-Sep-01, 13:06 (CDT), "Stefan Hornburg (Racke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please include an example how to use update-alternatives in the Debian > policy. Even reading the manpage left me without a clue how to fix > #112620, because I don't know how update-alternatives is called > the righ

Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts

2001-09-19 Thread Stefan Hornburg Racke
Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist Please include an example how to use update-alternatives in the Debian policy. Even reading the manpage left me without a clue how to fix #112620, because I don't know how update-alternatives is called the right way. Ciao Racke -- Racke happily

Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary]

2001-09-19 Thread Rick Troth
> I just got this on the vim-dev list. If this is indeed so (strip does > not work on s390) does that mean Debian policy forces us to have > large unstripped binaries on s390? I think there is a mix-up between z/OS (and OS/390) and Linux/390 in this discussion. 'strip' works just fine on Li

Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary]

2001-09-19 Thread Anthony Giorgio
When I refer to s390, I mean OS/390 or z/OS. My work environment is Unix System Services on a IBM eServer zSeries mainframe. I am NOT working in 390/Linux. As I said before, strip(1) in OS/390 is equivalent to touch(1). Sorry for the confusion. Anthony Giorgio DBX Developer Phone: (845) 435-

Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary]

2001-09-19 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Gerhard Tonn wrote: > He is not talking about Linux, but a certain flavor of UNIX that is running > on top of z/OS formerly called OS/390 formerly called MVS. D'oh, should have noticed that :( Wichert. -- _ / N

Re: [agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary]

2001-09-19 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 17:57, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > I just got this on the vim-dev list. If this is indeed so (strip does > not work on s390) does that mean Debian policy forces us to have > large unstripped binaries on s390? > > Wichert. > Strip works fine on s390. Most binaries in the

[agiorgio@us.ibm.com: Excessive size of s390 vim binary]

2001-09-19 Thread Wichert Akkerman
I just got this on the vim-dev list. If this is indeed so (strip does not work on s390) does that mean Debian policy forces us to have large unstripped binaries on s390? Wichert. - Forwarded message from Anthony Giorgio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: "Anthony Giorgio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>