Re: Question about build dependencies.

> "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marcus> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 05:19:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: >> Anyway, one can put a cvs checkout in the build rule w/o >> breaking any autobuilders, if you're really >> careful. base-config has had this for ages

Re: Question about build dependencies.

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 05:19:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Anyway, one can put a cvs checkout in the build rule w/o breaking any > autobuilders, if you're really careful. base-config has had this for > ages, without causing any problems: Sure. But it does open a security risk. If people manage

Re: Question about build dependencies.

> > No, you shouldn't check. > > It is not a bug if any kind of cvs command is in any kind of file. It is a > bug if that command is called during an automated build of a package. > > Blind scanning for cvs is wrong. > absolutely. grepping for a word almost never gives me the right results.