> No one is advocating such a position. It is a hallucination of your
> fevered mind.
My mistake. I could have sworn that several people suggested turning a
blind eye.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[You guys sure do appear to love private CCs...]
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 10:59:50PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> I have nothing against policy-compliant scripts.
>
> But why blessing a lie in policy is the option preferred by anyone is
> a mystery to me.
No one is advocating such a position. It
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 09:39:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Clint Adams wrote:
> > > Such as?
> >
> > test -x /usr/sbin/install-docs || echo hi
>
> Personally, the only such paths I ever hard code are /etc, #!/bin/sh,
> and #!/usr/bin/perl, and I've been thinking about using the env trick
> for
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.1
Severity: normal
This was discussed on the debian-policy mailing list under the
subject "Policy ambiguity regarding control files", first message
2002-05-14. Below is my initial message; note that there is a
relationship between this bug and #131583, since t
trsmgyptfshjmhrguwvllsm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Heath wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2002, Clint Adams wrote:
the problem is there is no better replacement for 'command -v'. And we do not
really need an exception -- every shell we have supports this. So the only way
Well, that's not true. As Luca has pointed out, /usr/bin/which is
Essentia
Previously Clint Adams wrote:
> Is this important in the event that install-docs gets moved, or so that
> someone can put a different install-docs in the PATH?
Both. Making things more fragile is always a Bad Idea.
Wichert.
--
_
Clint Adams wrote:
> > Such as?
>
> test -x /usr/sbin/install-docs || echo hi
Personally, the only such paths I ever hard code are /etc, #!/bin/sh,
and #!/usr/bin/perl, and I've been thinking about using the env trick
for that last. ess hardcoded paths is good for flexability, and avoid
possible
> That's different and more fragile: it relies on a fixed path which
> command -v does not.
Is this important in the event that install-docs gets moved, or so that
someone can put a different install-docs in the PATH?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Previously Clint Adams wrote:
> > Such as?
>
> test -x /usr/sbin/install-docs || echo hi
That's different and more fragile: it relies on a fixed path which
command -v does not.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This spac
> Does Debian explicitly support such a configuration? That's the point.
> I can symlink /bin/sh to /usr/bin/tcsh or /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 if I
> want, but that doesn't mean that the Debian packaging infrastructure
> offers to it for me via a debconf question, update-alternatives, or some
> similar
On Sat, 25 May 2002, Clint Adams wrote:
> > the problem is there is no better replacement for 'command -v'. And we do
> > not
> > really need an exception -- every shell we have supports this. So the only
> > way
>
> Well, that's not true. As Luca has pointed out, /usr/bin/which is
> Essentia
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:46:07PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > IMO, anyone who uses zsh for /bin/sh is quite insane. ;-)
>
> Perhaps, but it's been done.
Does Debian explicitly support such a configuration? That's the point.
I can symlink /bin/sh to /usr/bin/tcsh or /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 if I
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:46:07PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> Why we can't resolve this in a simple way is beyond me.
+ Gimme an F, gimme an R, gimme an E, E, Z, E. What does it spell?
Michael
--
"Aristotle gave you logic. Apply it."
-- Branden Robinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
> IMO, anyone who uses zsh for /bin/sh is quite insane. ;-)
Perhaps, but it's been done. And policy in its current state
fraudulently claims that it will work. Why we can't resolve this in a
simple way is beyond me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:22:17PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > the problem is there is no better replacement for 'command -v'. And we do
> > not
> > really need an exception -- every shell we have supports this. So the only
> > way
>
> Well, that's not true. As Luca has pointed out, /usr/bi
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 11:19:02PM +0200, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> Change the rules for all the Debian distribution because you find that
> 'command -v' is handy, seems quite excessive to me...
You need to stop hitting the hooch and start thinking more about what
Debian is trying to
> the problem is there is no better replacement for 'command -v'. And we do not
> really need an exception -- every shell we have supports this. So the only
> way
Well, that's not true. As Luca has pointed out, /usr/bin/which is
Essential at the moment. Also, not every shell in Debian support
> Such as?
test -x /usr/sbin/install-docs || echo hi
?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Change the rules for all the Debian distribution because you find that
> 'command -v' is handy, seems quite excessive to me...
>
the problem is there is no better replacement for 'command -v'. And we do not
really need an exception -- every shell we have supports this. So the only way
a pe
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> The same goal can be achived with other commands or shell builtin.
Such as?
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Branden,
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 03:28:35PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 03:42:40PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Below is a list of packages that may use 'command -v' in their #!/bin/sh
> > postinsts. Section 11.4 of Policy states that /bin/sh can be a symlink
> >
Package: debhelper
Version: 4.0.6
Severity: serious
Hi all,
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 03:28:35PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 03:42:40PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Below is a list of packages that may use 'command -v' in their #!/bin/sh
> > postinsts. Section 11.4 of
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 03:42:40PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> Below is a list of packages that may use 'command -v' in their #!/bin/sh
> postinsts. Section 11.4 of Policy states that /bin/sh can be a symlink
> to any POSIX-compatible shell, with an exception for 'echo', and that
> package #!/bin/
ãæ°ç¨¿å®ç¨å®å
¸ãï¼ç¬¬äºçï¼ç±å½å
æç¥åç稿件交æç½ç«
ä¸å½æ稿ç线http://www.tougao.net ç¼è¾èæï¼é¤æ¶å½å½å
æ
æçææ°æ¥ååå½ä¸ä¸å¤å®¶ä»¥å¤ï¼è¿æ3000å¤å®¶æ¥åçµåé®ç®±ï¼
æ°ç¨¿æ稿ç§è¯ãå½å
åºç社é讯å½ãäºåå¤å®
25 matches
Mail list logo
