On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:31:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 08:40:13AM -0600, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I'd like to rewrite policy soonish.
Into what, exactly?
Last time this came up we had a nice flamewar about it, but didn't seem
to resolve anything -- does it
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 09:28:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 09:20:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
It seems pointless given that you can't actually depend on the package
and expect it to do anything in particular - the package seems to serve
no purpose. I mean,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 05:34:52PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I think this makes a lot of conceptual sense. However, I don't think
that having three separate documents necessarily makes sense from a
reader's or editor's point of view.
I'm inclined to disagree: I don't see there being
Hallo, lange her dass wir uns
getroffen haben...aber ich kenne dich noch ! Hab jetzt endlich meine
Homepage erneuert. http://sandrachat.bl.am
hoffe man sieht
sich mal wieder im Chat. Sandra
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 12:27:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
I wouldn't say so. For example, a C compiler ought to provide
/usr/bin/cc in some form or another,
You're talking about an alternative for /usr/bin/cc. A thing that
compiles C source code into object files is a C compiler regardless
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:25:06PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Branden These appear to be equally valid arguments against all
Branden other virtual packages in Debian.
To mee this is simply an argument that the description entry in the
virtual packages list should be carefully written
retitle 154142 [PROPOSED] dhcp-client virtual package
reassign 154142 debian-policy
severity 154142 wishlist
thanks
--- virtual-package-names-list.txt~ 2002-07-28 13:11:31.0 -0500
+++ virtual-package-names-list.txt 2002-07-28 13:13:37.0 -0500
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
awk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 154142 [PROPOSED] dhcp-client virtual package
Bug#154142: etherconf only depends on dhcp-client
Changed Bug title.
reassign 154142 debian-policy
Bug#154142: [PROPOSED] dhcp-client virtual package
Bug reassigned from package `etherconf' to
On Jul 28, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeking seconds for this proposal.
Seconded.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:00:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:25:06PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
all other) case. Perhaps something like DHCP clients compatible with
ifup/ifdown
dead in the water. I doubt that providing a description as you suggest
will do
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:14:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I am seeking seconds for this proposal.
seconded.
--
michael d. ivey[McQ] : Every artist was first an amateur.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
http://gweezlebur.com/~ivey/ :
encrypted
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:14:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
--- virtual-package-names-list.txt~ 2002-07-28 13:11:31.0 -0500
+++ virtual-package-names-list.txt 2002-07-28 13:13:37.0 -0500
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
awk Anything providing suitable
Previously Matt Zimmerman wrote:
The only possible issue that I can see is that the introduction of this
virtual package would leave no way to depend specifically on the ISC DHCP
client 2.x, which is currently named dhcp-client.
You could take advantage of the fact that dpkg doesn't support
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 12:57:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 12:27:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
a mail transport agent ought to provide a /usr/sbin/sendmail
implementation
Only if policy says so. In and of itself this isn't a requirement
mandated by the fact
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.1
Severity: serious
The debian-policy package is missing a build-dependency on
docbook-utils; the package does not build from source.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo