On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:20:33AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
this-and-that function of Make (so far I remember only two of those, when
the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS env. variable was added and when testing for existence
of build-arch was added).
... which was a fiasco. Doogie finally implemented the
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:18:51PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
this-and-that function of Make (so far I remember only two of those, when
the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS env. variable was added and when testing for existence
of build-arch was added).
... which was a fiasco. Doogie finally
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:26PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
I'd be interested to see doogie's rationale, but it's amusing enough as it
stands, because the policy still says:
If one or both of the targets `build-arch' and `build-indep' are
not provided, then invoking
On 19-Oct-03, 04:20 (CDT), Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it's a historic injustice,
Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
The Man is keeping me down!
Up with perl, down with make!
Power to the people!
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:50:41AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
But it's a historic injustice,
Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
The Man is keeping me down!
Up with perl, down with make!
Power to the people!
We share an enthusiasm for overloaded phrases, I see :)
but a small verbal
On 19-Oct-03, 13:03 (CDT), Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:50:41AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
But it's a historic injustice,
Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
The Man is keeping me down!
Up with perl, down with make!
Power to the people!
We
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 03:58:19PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
I've yet to see a technical argument for allowing debian/rules to be a
non-makefile.
I've yet to see a technical argument for disallowing debian/rules from being
a non-makefile.
See, those two statements make the same amount of
7 matches
Mail list logo
