* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060610 03:11]:
> * Margarita Manterola [Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:35:54 -0300]:
>
> > So, in any case, I'd encourage you to patch dpkg to handle a new
> > "Homepage" field, and submit the patch. Once this is being used by a
> > big number of packages, you might brin
* Margarita Manterola [Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:35:54 -0300]:
> So, in any case, I'd encourage you to patch dpkg to handle a new
> "Homepage" field, and submit the patch. Once this is being used by a
> big number of packages, you might bring this up again.
> I'd really like to have the Homepage field
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> pe, 2006-06-09 kello 22:04 +0200, Bill Allombert kirjoitti:
>> Sometimes, the changelog will tell you the package was last changed 3
>> month ago while actually it was changed yesterday and build and uploaded
>> today. This can lead you to go on a wild-
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.0
Severity: normal
In section 9.1.1 under the second (2) bullet there is a typo regarding
dot files.
It reads:
"such files start with the '..' character"
and should read:
"such files start with the '.' character"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: te
pe, 2006-06-09 kello 22:04 +0200, Bill Allombert kirjoitti:
> Sometimes, the changelog will tell you the package was last changed 3
> month ago while actually it was changed yesterday and build and uploaded
> today. This can lead you to go on a wild-goose chase if you do not know
> about the proble
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:50:37PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 02:48:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 04:28:36AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
>> > > Date: [...] Talk to the dpkg maintainers--
>> > >
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:50:37PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 02:48:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 04:28:36AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > > Date: [...] Talk to the dpkg maintainers--
> > > they're free to implement this feature if they wan
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.0
Severity: minor
There is a minor typo in footnote 53[1] (or section 10.2, footnote 1).
-Position independent code may have s performance penalty
+Position independent code may have a performance penalty
1. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/footno
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006, Kai Hendry wrote:
> I have two ideas that I would like to see in Debian.
>
> Two extra fields that show up in /var/lib/dpkg/available
That won't be accepted. There are many other fields which I would like
to have but which won't be integrated.
That's why we need that:
http:/
9 matches
Mail list logo
