Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 02:25:49PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Please note that this (rpath) prevents automatic multiarch conversion
>> for packages. Instead of a simple post procesing of the deb files a
>> much more complicated change has to
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello.
In [1], Joerg Jaspert initiated discussion about including more licenses
in the set of licenses shipped in /usr/share/common-licensed. As part of
the discussion I inquired in [2] about the possibility of adding the GFDL
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 02:25:49PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Please note that this (rpath) prevents automatic multiarch conversion
> for packages. Instead of a simple post procesing of the deb files a
> much more complicated change has to be made to change the rpath. It
> also requires t
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 07:50:42AM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
> 2) It would be nice to have some further discussion on Steve's comment
>regarding the relative merit of using rpath and /usr/lib/
>versus moving all shared libraries into /usr/lib.
Uh, that was *not* the recommendat
Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I recently uploaded courierpassd, which wraps some functionality of
> courier-authlib in the popassd protocol. lintian has been warning me
> about the use of rpath, about which I posted on debian-mentors. This
> culminated in the following thread:
Hi,
I recently uploaded courierpassd, which wraps some functionality of
courier-authlib in the popassd protocol. lintian has been warning me
about the use of rpath, about which I posted on debian-mentors. This
culminated in the following thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/07/
6 matches
Mail list logo
