Re: Task list for a policy release

2007-12-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > #379150: Documentation for Breaks in dpkg > > This support was added in dpkg 1.14.6, so I'm inclined to accept and > commit this patch. I trust Ian to document the feature, and the wording > seems fine to me. The only caveat is that I don't know if we'r

Re: About Debian Policy translations (was: Re: Task list for a policy release)

2007-12-02 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 08:53:19PM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > On 01-12-2007 19:53, Marc Haber wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 04:52:16PM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) > > wrote: > >>Considering the chance of rewriting the document and using > >> UTF-8, can y

Re: Draft new policy document format

2007-12-02 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:29:28AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > At Debconf earlier this year, I gave a talk about the benefits First of all, thanks for revamping this. I'm really looking forward for some common format for writing policies and, personally, I would be very happy to port

Re: Task list for a policy release

2007-12-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 01 Dec 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: >> #379150: Documentation for Breaks in dpkg >> >> This support was added in dpkg 1.14.6, so I'm inclined to accept and >> commit this patch. I trust Ian to document the feature, and the wording >> seems fine t

Re: About Debian Policy translations

2007-12-02 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-12-2007 12:25, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 08:53:19PM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) > wrote: [...] >> You should be more confident on your fellow translators. :) > > After seeing the "quality" of Debian's German

Processed: usertagging 363133, tagging 363133, usertagging 402975, tagging 402975

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 > usertags 363133 = normative accepted Bug#363133: [PROPOSAL] Document support of package types in shlibs files User is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags were: wording normative dpkg. Usertag

Processing of debian-policy_3.7.3.0_i386.changes

2007-12-02 Thread Archive Administrator
debian-policy_3.7.3.0_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-policy_3.7.3.0.dsc debian-policy_3.7.3.0.tar.gz debian-policy_3.7.3.0_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Processed: unmerging 447389, tagging 447389

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 > unmerge 447389 Bug#447389: Please mention menu-2 format Bug#361418: [Proposal] new Debian menu structure Bug#440995: www.debian.org: please update the menu policy Bug#445891: menu po

Bug#361418: marked as done ([Proposal] new Debian menu structure)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361418: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#392594: marked as done (typo: "must not be not world-writable")

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392594: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#435207: marked as done (Small spelling errors and erratic sentences in debian-policy)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#435207: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#440995: marked as done (www.debian.org: please update the menu policy)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361418: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#453265: marked as done (debian-policy: [menu-policy.txt.gz] Apps menu should read 'Applications')

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361418: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#420701: marked as done (debian-policy: GFDL is now in common-licenses)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#420701: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#431813: marked as done (support for wrapped Uploaders should now be mandatory)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431813: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#382612: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] Document ~ behavior in version numbers)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382612: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#418444: marked as done (debian-policy: recommend binary:Version substvar instead)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#418444: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#412634: marked as done (5.6.17 (Urgency) should list emergency, maybe a normative list?)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#412634: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#448035: marked as done (debian-policy: 822-date is deprecated (use date -R instead))

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#448035: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#440931: marked as done (debian-policy: Virtual package for Japanese font packages(ttf-japanese-mincho and ttf-japanese-gothic))

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#440931: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#413575: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] debian-policy: New virtual package: dictd-dictionary)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#413575: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#445891: marked as done (menu policy is not uptodate)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361418: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#402975: marked as done (debian-policy: Introduce a requirement for internationalisation of debconf templates)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#402975: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#424212: marked as done (debian-policy: FTBFS if built twice in a row)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424212: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#442540: marked as done (debian-policy: FTBFS if build twice in a row)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424212: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#294962: marked as done (Please add "local" to list of supra-POSIX features that /bin/sh can be expected to offer)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294962: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

debian-policy_3.7.3.0_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: debian-policy_3.7.3.0.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.7.3.0.dsc debian-policy_3.7.3.0.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.7.3.0.tar.gz debian-policy_3.7.3.0_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.7.3.0_all.deb Override entries for yo

Bug#363133: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] Document support of package types in shlibs files)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363133: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#444270: marked as done (debian-policy: policy doesn't say anything on ~ in Version numbers)

2007-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382612: fixed in debian-policy 3.7.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is