Possible MBF wrt common, FHS-compliant, default document root for the various web servers

2009-11-07 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:21:48AM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: Okay, I understand. Now, I see two ways actually to solve this. 1. If we have a generic location for packages to drop their html/php/whatever files, like

Re: Possible MBF wrt common, FHS-compliant, default document root for the various web servers

2009-11-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:23:22PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm a écrit : I still see a problem with the upgrade path for existing installations. I might be wrong but I think the most difficult cases are very custom setups with lots of changes by the local admin. I'm thinking of e.g.

Re: Possible MBF wrt common, FHS-compliant, default document root for the various web servers

2009-11-07 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
Thanks for your response, Charles! On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:09:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: As a maintainer of a web application, I share your worries. I never had any user request to make it work out of the box with alternative web servers, so I guess that my users have nothing to gain

Bug#555009: debian-policy: alt. changelog formats are still advertised

2009-11-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.3.0 Severity: minor According to upgrading-checklist, support for alternative changelog formats were removed in Debian Policy 3.8.1.0. However, appendix C still documents their usage: $ zgrep -A4 'alternative changelog'