On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:21:48AM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
Okay, I understand. Now, I see two ways actually to solve this.
1. If we have a generic location for packages to drop their
html/php/whatever files, like
Le Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:23:22PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm a écrit :
I still see a problem with the upgrade path for existing installations.
I might be wrong but I think the most difficult cases are very custom
setups with lots of changes by the local admin. I'm thinking of e.g.
Thanks for your response, Charles!
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:09:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
As a maintainer of a web application, I share your worries. I never had any
user request to make it work out of the box with alternative web servers, so I
guess that my users have nothing to gain
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.3.0
Severity: minor
According to upgrading-checklist, support for alternative changelog
formats were removed in Debian Policy 3.8.1.0. However, appendix C still
documents their usage:
$ zgrep -A4 'alternative changelog'
4 matches
Mail list logo