On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 22:29 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> jida...@jidanni.org writes:
> >> "RA" == Russ Allbery writes:
>
> > RA> No, I don't believe that it should. I don't think this is something
> > that
> > RA> we need to make technical Policy about.
>
> > RA> I'll leave this bug open f
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
>> "RA" == Russ Allbery writes:
> RA> No, I don't believe that it should. I don't think this is something that
> RA> we need to make technical Policy about.
> RA> I'll leave this bug open for a bit before closing in case someone else
> RA> disagrees.
> Well then
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
> > "RA" == Russ Allbery writes:
>
> RA> No, I don't believe that it should. I don't think this is
> RA> something that we need to make technical Policy about.
>
> Well then please add in the manual that Debian officially has no
> opinion on dates on the man pages,
> "RA" == Russ Allbery writes:
RA> No, I don't believe that it should. I don't think this is something that
RA> we need to make technical Policy about.
RA> I'll leave this bug open for a bit before closing in case someone else
RA> disagrees.
Well then please add in the manual that Debian o
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
> The Debian Policy Manual should state what the preferred date on manual
> pages should be, or wishes upstream would make it.
No, I don't believe that it should. I don't think this is something that
we need to make technical Policy about.
I'll leave this bug open fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
X-debbugs-Cc: man...@packages.debian.org, rad...@cox.net
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/ch-docs.html
The Debian Policy Manual should state what the preferred date on manual
pages should be, or wishes upstream would make it.
Hi!
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 19:51:17 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 07:45:16PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > On 11/25/2010 07:18 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 16:25:35 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > >> In #509702, Philipp Kern says that a particular packa
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 07:45:16PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 11/25/2010 07:18 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 16:25:35 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >> In #509702, Philipp Kern says that a particular package's list of
> >> architectures should be specified in the source stanz
On 11/25/2010 07:18 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 16:25:35 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>> In #509702, Philipp Kern says that a particular package's list of
>> architectures should be specified in the source stanza of the control
>> file, not in the binary packages' desc
Hi!
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 16:25:35 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> In #509702, Philipp Kern says that a particular package's list of
> architectures should be specified in the source stanza of the control
> file, not in the binary packages' descriptions, to avoid any attempt
> to build the package
Hi,
In #509702, Philipp Kern says that a particular package's list of
architectures should be specified in the source stanza of the control
file, not in the binary packages' descriptions, to avoid any attempt
to build the package on the rest of the architectures.
While this sounds as a very sensi
12 matches
Mail list logo
