On ke, 2011-04-13 at 10:49 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 07:16:17PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> > reopen 609160
> > thanks
> >
> > Attached please find my changes to the docbook conversion.
> >
> > * remove drivers from abstract (we're mentioned in acks, which is
>
Le Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 07:16:17PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> reopen 609160
> thanks
>
> Attached please find my changes to the docbook conversion.
>
> * remove drivers from abstract (we're mentioned in acks, which is
> enough)
> * a couple of missing spaces from markup
> * removal of usel
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 06:41:10PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> (Cc to the relevant bug added.)
>>
>> On ma, 2011-04-11 at 14:05 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: System users: removing them"):
>> > > Thus, I propose to change 9.2.2 "UID and GID classes", the paragraph
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 06:41:10PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> (Cc to the relevant bug added.)
>
> On ma, 2011-04-11 at 14:05 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: System users: removing them"):
> > > Thus, I propose to change 9.2.2 "UID and GID classes", the paragraph on
>
Hi Lars,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 06:41:10PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > But shouldn't we say they _must_ lock package-specific system users
> > and groups when the package is removed ?
>
> I think that's a good idea. Steve Langasek in the bug (#621833) and
> others agree, so I think there's
(Cc to the relevant bug added.)
On ma, 2011-04-11 at 14:05 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: System users: removing them"):
> > Thus, I propose to change 9.2.2 "UID and GID classes", the paragraph on
> > uids in the range 100-999, to add the following sentence to the end of
>
6 matches
Mail list logo