Hi,
On Sat, 03 Sep 2011, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I though about this, but couldn't come up with any easy solution. I
> mostly consider this tool to be useful for people who just have to check
> the very last versions of the policy, so the problem is actually quite
> mitigated.
>
> I don't ev
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 09:57:09AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> there is a missing ‘of’ preposition in §5.1 and here is a patch that
> adds it. I think that it is trivial enough and non-normative so that
> it may not be necessary to open a bug.
Commited as 4d25f1055ce4bed3
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.2.0
Severity: minor
Hi there,
just some nitpicking regarding upgrading-checklist:
| 9.1.1
| Packages installing to architecture-specific subdirectories of
| `/url/lib' must use the value returned by (...)
Obviously that should be `/usr/l
merge 626408 640367
thanks
Hi Cristoph
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:35:43PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.9.2.0
> Severity: minor
>
> Hi there,
>
> just some nitpicking regarding upgrading-checklist:
>
> | 9.1.1
> | Packages installing to archit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 626408 640367
Bug#626408: debian-policy: Typo in upgrading-checklist.txt: /url/lib -> /usr/lib
Bug#640367: debian-policy: Typo in upgrading-checklist: s/url/usr/
Merged 626408 640367.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote...
> This seems to be fixed in git repository, see
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/626408
No idea how I could have missed that one when checking the BTS.
Sorry for the noise.
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
6 matches
Mail list logo
