Le Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:57:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
> > It's a small thing, but this makes the commas italic, which looks
> > especially strange in the text rendering. Do we care that the section
> > names are italic? My preference would be to make them
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> It's a small thing, but this makes the commas italic, which looks
> especially strange in the text rendering. Do we care that the section
> names are italic? My preference would be to make them plain text for
> readability.
Yeah, that's a good idea. Charles, could yo
Hi,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> thank you for your report. Indeed, the section 'tasks' is missing.
>
> I have reviewed the current list, and in addition to 'tasks' missing, I found
> that it was not perfectly sorted in alphabetical order.
[...]
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -714,21 +7
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was ple...@debian.org).
> usertags 670429 normative
Bug#670429: debian-policy: section tasks is missing
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normati
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
usertags 670429 normative
severity 670429 normal
tags 670429 patch
thanks
Le Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:56:09PM +0200, Carsten Hey a écrit :
>
> "2.4 Sections" is missing the section 'tasks':
>
> projectb=> select s.section, s.created from section s where s.se
Charles Plessy writes:
> §3.7 defines the "base system" as required plus important pacakges.
> With this patch, we have the nice definition that "required" implements
> the "essential" part, and "important" implements the rest of the base.
> I think that it explains better the role of these prior
Le Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:46:10PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> Good catch. That means the wording needs a little more work, to
> explain that only one of 'mawk' and 'gawk' (and one of 'sysv-rc' and
> 'file-rc', etc) has to be of priority required. (*)
>
> Maybe we should define it as a
Le Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:04:57PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
> > Thanks again for your help. I've applied all suggested changes.
> > Interdiff and updated patch attached.
>
> Looks good to me -- seconded.
Hello everybody,
Formally speaking, we need one more per
Le Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:46:03AM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog a écrit :
> We should thus modify the policy to say:
>
> 1/ that the changelog and copyright files ought to be installed in the
>DEBIAN directory along with the other control files
>
>(this will require changes in dh_installdocs an
* Raphael Hertzog [2012-07-13 09:00 +0200]:
> Guillem introduced the --control-list and --control-show interfaces …
>
> If … , we should IMO create a new package that will hook into dpkg
> --post-invoke and …
>
> … should create dpkg --changelog and dpkg --copyright …
[epoch:]upstream_version[-deb
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Russ Allbery wrote:
> HOWEVER, I think putting those files in a clear place on the file system
> so that they can be easily read via a pager by the end user without using
> dpkg-query commands is not only mandatory for the transition period but
> mandatory permanently. I would
11 matches
Mail list logo
