user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
tags 641153 - patch
usertags 641153 seconded
thanks
Le Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 09:01:47PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> Here's the same patch with the above fixes applied. Sensible?
Thanks for the corrections.
The patch is seconded by me, Russ and Ans
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was ple...@debian.org).
> tags 641153 - patch
Bug #641153 [debian-policy] document Built-Using field for binary packages
Removed tag(s) patch.
> usertags 641
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was ple...@debian.org).
> usertags 681562 + informative issue
Bug#681562: debian-policy: Consolidate the definition of the "base system".
There were no usert
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Dear all,
the "base system" is defined in section 3.7 (chapter 3 describes binary
packages). It consists of packages of priorities "required" and "important",
and these priorities are defined in section 2.5 (chapter 2 describes the Debian
archive). The
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was ple...@debian.org).
> usertags 654958 + seconded
Bug#654958: debian-policy: Document VCS fields.
Usertags were: normative.
Usertags are now: normative se
Hi!
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 22:51:12 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Thanks again for your help. I've applied all suggested changes.
> Interdiff and updated patch attached.
Seconded.
thanks,
guillem
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Guillem Jover writes:
> Also although my initial motivation was to solve the binNMU+multiarch
> case, I consider it now it's a worthwhile change by itself, regardless
> of how the binNMU+multiarch problem ends up being solved.
I'm inclined to agree, particularly with an eye to the whole doc dire
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 23:29:48 +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog [2012-07-13 09:00 +0200]:
> > Guillem introduced the --control-list and --control-show interfaces …
> >
> > If … , we should IMO create a new package that will hook into dpkg
> > --post-invoke and …
> >
> > … should create
Le Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:12:51PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
> > Question
> >
> > I'm happy to hear you have ideas for a smoother policy process. Could
> > you suggest a few? Maybe we can batch them up and make a general
> > resolution. :)
>
> I think t
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 09:00:59 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> In any case, I believe we should create dpkg --changelog
> and dpkg --copyright as the canonical end-user interface.
I've mentioned this several times now, I've something similar to that
alreadyd implemented locally. I just didn't incl
10 matches
Mail list logo
