Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Policy §10.7.4 explains:
> If it is desirable for [...] packages to share a configuration
> file and for all of the related packages to be able to modify
> that configuration file, then the following should be done:
> [...]
> ii. The owning package should also pro
Russ Allbery wrote:
> We may have existing special cases where we've ignored this problem for
> reasons of expediency, but I don't think that's a good reason to water
> down the requirement globally.
Thanks. How about this?
My impression is that this "must" has been treated as a "should" in
pra
Hi Chris, Hideki,
Le 08/08/2012 21:48, David Prévot a écrit :
> I'd be happy to poke translators
And here I am, could you please update your translation in order to push
the last up to date version in the upcoming Wheezy?
> po4a/po/de.po: 1319 translated messages, 22 fuzzy translations, 2
> un
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> My impression is that this "must" has been treated as a "should" in
> practice, and I don't think it's because of the detail of wording
> addressed by the first hunk of the patch below. The interoperability
> problems caused by violating this piece of policy are subtle,
Dear Policy hackers,
during a periodic review of outstanding delegations, the auditors,
observed that the delegation for the Policy editors is scattered through
several "patch" mails over ~6 years and across several different mailing
list. I'd rather prefer clean slate delegations, and to achiev
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> What best occasion, to check if someone would like to step back as
> editor and if others would like to step in as full editors?
Definitely agreed.
> Concretely:
> - If you are currently a (delegated) Policy editor, please reconfirm
> your interest in such a role
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:38:57PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Dear Policy hackers,
> during a periodic review of outstanding delegations, the auditors,
> observed that the delegation for the Policy editors is scattered through
> several "patch" mails over ~6 years and across several diffe
Hello everybody.
I would like to serve as a Policy editor.
I think that I have a good understanding by experience of the Policy changes
process, of more than half of the Policy chapters, of DocBook syntax, of
how the debian-policy package builds and of how its contents are displayed
on www.debian
* Stefano Zacchiroli (lea...@debian.org) [120813 20:39]:
> - If you are currently a (delegated) Policy editor, please reconfirm
> your interest in such a role, by mailing me and/or this list. (For the
> avoidance of doubt, I'm Bcc:-ing all current delegates.)
Even if I hadn't been doing much,
9 matches
Mail list logo
