On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:39:45PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> > On 06/04/2014 03:41 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > * Other programs could “easily” use dpkg-architecture to check for
> > >identity or a match. (This poses problem
Hi,
2016-01-20 14:39 GMT+01:00 Colin Watson :
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
>> On 06/04/2014 03:41 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> > * Other programs could “easily” use dpkg-architecture to check for
>> >identity or a match. (This poses problems for programs tha
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 03:41 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > * Other programs could “easily” use dpkg-architecture to check for
> >identity or a match. (This poses problems for programs that do not
>
> I think making apt call dpkg-architect
Hi,
On 06/04/2014 03:41 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 22:04:48 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>> * Johannes Schauer [140522 13:30]:
>>> Debian policy 11.1.1 [1] and the associated footnote [2] allow
>>> architecture wildcards of the form os-any and any-cpu. Apt seems t
4 matches
Mail list logo