Bug#908933: debian-policy: typo in document in section 3.4 page no 15 line number 16 needs improvement.

2018-09-16 Thread Jaikumar Sharma
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.9.8.0 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, debian-policy has typo under section 3.4 The description of the package page no.15 and line number 16 has following text which needs improvement in spelling of 'administratrivia' . ** text from policy** Copyright statements

Bug#908933: debian-policy: typo in document in section 3.4 page no 15 line number 16 needs improvement.

2018-09-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2018-09-16 at 14:01 +0530, Jaikumar Sharma wrote: > debian-policy has typo under section 3.4 The description of the > package page no.15 and line number 16 has following text which needs > improvement in spelling of 'administratrivia' . > ** text from policy** > Copyright statements and oth

Bug#908933: debian-policy: typo in document in section 3.4 page no 15 line number 16 needs improvement.

2018-09-16 Thread Jaikumar Sharma
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 2:48 PM Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Are you sure? I've always known the shorter spelling and a random > online sample of sources that agree gives: At first sight it looked like it is a typo, of course i see 'administratrivia' synonymous for 'administrative details' as I coul

Bug#907665: developers-reference: Section 6.7.9 about dbg packages outdated

2018-09-16 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: tags -1 patch I've wrote some kind of draft for the dbgsyms... Please make sure to review the language and conten ;-) (and edit directly in the MR if you want) MR https://salsa.debian.org/debian/developers-reference/merge_requests/7 -- Cheers, tobi

Processed: retitle 907666 to developers-reference: Updating the German translation

2018-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 907666 developers-reference: Updating the German translation Bug #907666 [src:developers-reference] developers-reference: (partially) updating the German translations Changed Bug title to 'developers-reference: Updating the German transla

Processed: Re: developers-reference: Section 6.7.9 about dbg packages outdated

2018-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #907665 [src:developers-reference] developers-reference: Section 6.7.9 about dbg packages outdated Added tag(s) patch. -- 907665: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907665 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Processed: Re: developers-reference: two chapters regarding the 'default' field

2018-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #818850 [developers-reference] developers-reference: two chapters regarding the 'default' field Added tag(s) patch. -- 818850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818850 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#818850: developers-reference: two chapters regarding the 'default' field

2018-09-16 Thread Tobias Frost
Source: developers-reference Followup-For: Bug #818850 Control: tags -1 patch MR: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/developers-reference/merge_requests/8 Please review and if necessary just edit in the MR (or let me know what you'd like to see changed) -- tobi -- System Information: Debian Rel

Processed: Re: Bug#908933: debian-policy: typo in document in section 3.4 page no 15 line number 16 needs improvement.

2018-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 +moreinfo Bug #908933 [debian-policy] debian-policy: typo in document in section 3.4 page no 15 line number 16 needs improvement. Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 908933: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908933 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact o

Bug#908933: debian-policy: typo in document in section 3.4 page no 15 line number 16 needs improvement.

2018-09-16 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello, On Sun 16 Sep 2018 at 03:24PM +0530, Jaikumar Sharma wrote: > [M]y personal opinion is, would have been better if we could have used > 'administrative details' . This would not be right; there is a difference in meaning between 'administrative details' and 'admi