> "Sean" == Sean Whitton writes:
Sean> Encouragement is still normative, so if we're going to encourage it,
Sean> it would be better to say /when/ it's encouraged and when it's not.
I think it should be encouraged when there is not a good reason to do
otherwise.
I think the most com
Hello,
On Fri 24 Jan 2020 at 10:47AM -05, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I think should -> encouraged would go a lot of the way.
> Especially with a sentence along the lines of
> "Often, preserving an upstream's choice of service unit name is more
> important than having a service unit match a package's na
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Ah, hm, yes, that's a good point that I didn't notice when copying
that
Russ> Policy recommendation over from the recommendations on init scripts.
Russ> The obvious concern here is that multiple packages could use the same
Russ> servic
3 matches
Mail list logo
