David Steele writes:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:21 AM Ansgar wrote:
>> Given topydo just provides/conflicts with devtodo to provide the "todo"
>> binary, this seems to violate Policy 10.1 "Binaries" unless they provide
>> the same functionality.
[...]
> From where I stand, I would expect the Polic
I see two complaints about the "todo" virtual package:
1) it encompasses applications that may not have sufficiently identical
interfaces, and/or
2) it uses Conflicts as a transition mechanism.
Resolving (2) exceeds my threshold. I'll drop the todo package.
That leaves todo.txt, implemented b
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:40 PM Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:00:23PM -0500, Dave Steele wrote:
>
> /usr/bin/todo is not registered as an alternative by devtodo,
> so you cannot register it as an alternative in another package.
> The conflict between devtodo and topydo is not
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:44 PM David Steele wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:21 AM Ansgar wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Should emacs provide a "todo" script to open ~/TODO (with say org-mode)?
>>
>
In regards to org mode. I'd add a third criteria - the expectation that the
underlying
file complies with
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:21 AM Ansgar wrote:
>
> Given topydo just provides/conflicts with devtodo to provide the "todo"
> binary, this seems to violate Policy 10.1 "Binaries" unless they provide
> the same functionality.
>
Note that there is a Conflicts because the current devtodo
does not supp
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:00:23PM -0500, Dave Steele wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:54 AM Ansgar wrote:
>
> > Package: topydo
> > Version: 0.13-5
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Example use of `todo` from devtodo:
> >
> > +---
> > | Add a task, like so:
> > |
> > | $ todo -a I should really upd
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:54 AM Ansgar wrote:
> Package: topydo
> Version: 0.13-5
> Severity: serious
>
> Example use of `todo` from devtodo:
>
> +---
> | Add a task, like so:
> |
> | $ todo -a I should really update my homepage
> |
> | List all open tasks:
> |
> | $ todo
> |
> | Mark a task as co
David Steele writes:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:15 PM Bill Allombert wrote:
>
>> What about devtodo ?
>>
>> Reading your summary, it seems that the todo.txt virtual package
>> is well specified, but the todo one is not.
>>
>> Do you envision to have packages depending on todo and then use the
>> t
8 matches
Mail list logo