Bug#1074014: Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

2024-08-07 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Helmut" == Helmut Grohne writes: Helmut> In bullseye and earlier, I guess it works. Helmut> If you start with bullseye or earlier, upgrade to bookworm Helmut> and then to trixie, it continues to work, because the dash Helmut> maintainer scripts preserve any diversion that

Bug#1074014: Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

2024-08-07 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Thorsten, On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 09:59:09AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >that the way people tend to use mksh is by adding a local diversion for > > Unfortunately not. > > The way we have to do it since squeeze, when dash unilaterally broke > cross-package coordination, is: > > dpkg-rec

Bug#1074014: Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

2024-08-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
(Another data point is that there’s versions of mksh with version numbers larger than what’s in sid around in my own repo, for those wanting to follow CVS snapshots more closely, backported to all versions up to sarge, so bookworm users can very well have mksh packages with a version number that is

Bug#1074014: Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

2024-08-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Helmut Grohne dixit: >that the way people tend to use mksh is by adding a local diversion for Unfortunately not. The way we have to do it since squeeze, when dash unilaterally broke cross-package coordination, is: dpkg-reconfigure dash ⇒ remove its owning of /bin/sh (so it reverts to bash) ln

Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

2024-08-07 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Thorsten and Russ, thanks for dissecting the disagreement. Your reply helped me better understand what Thorsten probably sees as a problem. On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 05:23:35PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Second, you believe the existing migration strategy will not work safely > for mksh becaus