s in the main archive, required targets must not attempt
+Except for packages in the non-free archive with the ``Autobuild``
+control field unset or set to ``no``, required targets must not attempt
network access, except, via the loopback interface, to services on the
build host that have been st
Hi,
On 2024-04-03 12:37, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 06:58:35AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2024-04-02 09:21, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Mon 01 Apr 2024 at 05:29pm +02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
Hi,
On 2024-04-02 09:21, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon 01 Apr 2024 at 05:29pm +02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Version: 4.6.2.1
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, wb-t...@buildd.debian.org
>
On 2024-04-01 18:18, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 06:08:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2024-04-01 17:52, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 05:29:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > Package: debian-policy
> > &
On 2024-04-01 17:52, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 05:29:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Version: 4.6.2.1
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, wb-t...@buildd.debian.org
> > Control: affects
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.2.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, wb-t...@buildd.debian.org
Control: affects -1 buildd.debian.org
Hi,
The debian policy, section 4.9, forbids network access for packages in
the main archive, which implicitly means they are authorized for
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.4.0.1
Severity: wishlist
There is already a section about reproducibility in the debian-policy,
but it only mentions the binary packages. It might be a good idea to
add a new requirement that repeatedly building the source package in
the same environment produces
Architecture:
> my-laptops-arch` whenever their arch:all package FTBFSs on another arch.
>
> Zooming out a bit:
>
> We do not normally add fields to Policy until they are already in use in
> the archive.
>
> Looking at codesearch.debian.net reveals that only a single package
On 2017-08-22 09:42, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> writes:
> > On 2017-08-21 14:35, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> >> 9.1.1
> >> Only the dynamic linker may install files to /lib64/.
>
> > How is that supposed to work for th
re. That said you should define what is a 64 bit
architecture. On x32 (not an official architecture) for example
libc6-amd64:x32 installs files in /lib64 and libc6-amd64-dev:x32
installs file in /usr/lib64. Is it considered a 32-bit architecture or
a 64-bit architecture?
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Ja
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:08:58AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Aurelien Jarno
How can we progress on this bug? We now have bugs #720777, #720778 and
#720780 which ask for /usr/libqual to be created if /libqual exists.
It's something that can be implemented, but before doing so, I
if a decision has been taken wrt the policy.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
/taglist/p
sect Version 3.9.1.0
--
1.7.1
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this comment from Aurelien Jarno:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522776#342
This will only be done with the approval of the release team, who
I've copied in.
I know some persons already tried to work on that, so if patches are
already available, they will be really
Roger Leigh a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:44:10AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Roger Leigh a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:14:47PM -0500, David Holland wrote:
Can this please get done (adding a C.UTF-8 locale)? It is absolutely
required for writing shell scripts that handle UTF-8
from the release team first.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
http://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a
build failure, rarely but enough often to bother us (and the SRM team).
That's why I would advise to call make -j explicitely in the parts that
have been well tested.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.2
Severity: wishlist
A few packages in the archive are providing sources, but the .deb
packages are not rebuild from those sources. That is allowed as there
is nothing in the DFSG nor in the debian-policy that prevents a binary
package to not be built from
19 matches
Mail list logo
