amespace pollution for the majority that doesn't
> use mh (given that mh uses a lot of commands with overly generic names).
>
> If the mh bin directory is in the default path, what's the point?
Agreed.
- chad
--
Chad Mil
from the most
recent version, because the Stable will be replaced in (using the
equinoxes as freeze-points) six months -- not more than a year! There
need never be ``exceptions'' and delays again.
So, am I nuts? Overzealous? Has this been discussed before?
Wierd. Is someone trying to be naughty?- chad
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 11:04:08AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 0subscribe
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
A young student ca
>From the responses I've received, I guess I should be more precise in
what I'd like to do:
(Cross-?)Compile GNU programs for SunOS, and release them. No kernel, no
Sun binaries, &c. It should contain exactly everything that's released
with Debian Linux or Hurd, except the kernel, and kernel
My company has recently seen the virtues of Solaris' (iron) bells and
whistles, and it's adding a significant about of hardware to take
advantage of the SunOS kernel and the harware features.
I, however am stuck with the braindead userland utilities Sun
distributes, and this causes me to ask alou
5 matches
Mail list logo
