Bug#682347: mark 'editor' virtual package name as obsolete

ally good at, dropping the > existing "editor" virtual package seems Just Wrong to me. Nano is priority important which means it will be installed by default and someone who explicitly uninstalls nano will probably also install another editor. I doubt a dependency on editor will make any difference in practice. Kind regards, Jeroen Dekkers

Re: The Serious severity

ng "think about if from my perspective". And from talking with Marcus about this thread on IRC, I know he already did that. We want to release with woody+1, I hope you will help to make that possible. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: init.d scripts and LSB

Debian GNU/Hurd is following the GNU standards instead of the LSB. Debian *BSD won't follow the LSB either, I think they are going to be similar as the existing BSDs. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debi