Hi,
Quoting Bill Allombert (2023-09-10 18:29:36)
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 09:00:22AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> > > Quoting Hideki Yamane (2023-09-10 11:00:07)
> > >> Hmm, how about providing license-common package and that depends on
> > >> "license-common-list"
Hi,
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2022-10-05 20:08:19)
> I think this text is already quite good. I am yet wondering about the scope
> of support that we mention here.
>
> 1. You write that we want essential + build-essential. In practice, we
>also want things such as apt or systemd. I am wondering
Hi Russ,
thank you for your explanations, things are quite a bit clearer now.
Quoting Russ Allbery (2022-09-20 05:47:45)
> The point of putting this in Policy is to provide guidance to the
> packagers, not to the bootstrappers. Presumably you already have other
> documentation that you maintain
Source: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.1.1
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-root-support
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org, debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
in [1] Russ asked us to submit a policy bug about DPKG_ROOT so here it
goes. :)
[1] https://lists.debian.org/
s, josch>From dc186d400e47c9eed7dc94a2be4daa59b3fa2665 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 22:50:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fixup B-D alternatives footnote (closes: #999826)
---
policy/ch-relationships.rst | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions
Hi,
Quoting Bill Allombert (2021-11-17 14:40:57)
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:31:33PM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> wrote:
> > Quoting Bill Allombert (2021-11-17 13:06:09)
> > > > 1. "they are not normally used by the Debian autobuilders" should
&
Quoting Bill Allombert (2021-11-17 13:06:09)
> > 1. "they are not normally used by the Debian autobuilders" should instead
> >be "they are never used by the Debian autobuilders" or it should state
> >when they are used and when they are not
>
> If the base system on top of which the build-
Source: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.0.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org
Hi,
currently, footnote [1] of ยง7 states:
> While Build-Depends, Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Depends-Arch permit
> the use of alternative dependencies, these are not normally used by the
> Debian autobuilder
Quoting Sean Whitton (2021-08-18 22:21:15)
> On Wed 18 Aug 2021 at 11:10AM +02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> >> 9.1.1
> >> No package is allowed to install files in ``/usr/lib64/``. Previously,
> >> this prohibition only applied to packages for 64-bit architectures.
> >
> > This path is used
Hi,
for everybody else who is reading this bug and was not reading debian-devel at
the same time, here is the thread that Tim started there for more context:
https://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.20.2102211635290.6...@einstein.home.woodall.me.uk
Quoting Tim Woodall (2021-02-22 18:28:56)
> On Mon
10 matches
Mail list logo
