Source: developers-reference
Version: 13.6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 13.7
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Hi,
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 18:51:52 -0700 Russ Allbery wrote:
"""
+``systemd`` uses dependency and ordering information contained within the
++enabled unit files to decide which services to run and in which order.
"""
^ is that "+" before "enabled" really intended? It looks weird to me.
Paul
Dear Policy Editors,
On 21-11-2019 13:59, Paul Gevers wrote:
> [Disclaimer: the words below are as a member of the release team, but
> not necessarily those of the team. We haven't discussed this yet.]
We have had a discussion, and there were no objections against my vision
below.
&
Dear Russ,
[Disclaimer: the words below are as a member of the release team, but
not necessarily those of the team. We haven't discussed this yet.]
On 17-11-2019 20:47, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Let me copy the release team. How would you all prefer to handle the
> relationship between
h -- thanks!
Thanks. I think this is easier to read.
> On Fri, Jun 15 2018, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> On 15-06-18 14:43, Sean Whitton wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 14 2018, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>>
>>>>> + - A space separated list o
Hi Sean,
On 15-06-18 14:43, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14 2018, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
>>> + - A space separated list of keywords described below. These must
insert "keywords" here? ^
>>> + always contain a fo
I want to second this text, but have some questions.
> diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> index 0771346..3519d99 100644
> --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> @@ -1020,6 +1022,118 @@ This field is automatically added to
I second the diff below.
Paul
diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
index 0771346..166cdd8 100644
--- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
+++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
@@ -552,9 +552,10 @@ The three components here are:
omitted, in which case zero is assumed.
Hi,
As promised, I send the converted dbapp-policy documentation to this
bug. Credits go to Osamu, any bug is mine.
Paul
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd; [
]>
Best practices for packaging database applications
Sean Finney
This draft describes a set of
Hi Mathias,
On 23-07-17 18:25, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> As the bug title says, those recommendations are best practices and for me
> there
> is no need to put them into policy.
There is lots of best practices in policy. It is written as "xyz
*should* abc".
> There can always be good reasons to
Hi Debian developers,
This e-mail is meant for maintainers of applications that use databases
and for those of you that are interested in how packages should handle
those.
In bug 845255ยน I started the discussion for inclusion of the "best
practices for packaging database applications" in the
Hi all,
I hate to ping bugs, but is there anything I can do to help this move
forward? (The policy 4.0.0 release reminded me of this bug).
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:17:55 +0100 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
> It has been a while since the first version of the "
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It has been a while since the first version of the "Best practices for
packaging database applications" was drafted by Sean Finney as the creator of
dbconfig-common. The discussion on the document has died
Hi,
On 30-05-16 09:42, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:40:32PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:00:28AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a patch
> (or upgrade to a snapshot)
On 05-07-12 01:58, Charles Plessy wrote:
thank for your patience. I think that the patch you sent nicely enhances
the chapter 5.13.
Thanks.
On the typograhy side, it is very minor, but since you added a bullet point to
the list in 5.13.2, you can make the now previous bullet point finish by
On 02-07-12 02:52, Charles Plessy wrote:
I just read through the section 5.13 again (The testing distribution). I
see
that details about britney are given in 5.13.2.5.
I agree that this is a better place.
Also, it would not be completely
consistent to describe in 5.13.2 how to use the
On 29-06-12 23:14, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: Hi,
you either want to install aspell, or you might want to contact
debian-l10-english for a review of your patch.
I am sorry for this stupid mistake.
Please find a new patch attached.
Paul
Index: pkgs.dbk
+transitions may be switched off altogether. The Debian Release
team can override +the urgency;
I am not sure what is meant by overriding the urgency. The Release
team can directly control the migration time for a package, but this
is not exactly done by replacing the urgency by another
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
During the NM process my AM and I discovered that it is not documented that the
Release team can override the urgency of a package. I informed with the Release
team how to
19 matches
Mail list logo
