small issues with the spec.
> >>>
> >>> - SIL Open Font License (OFL), Version 1.1. should just use the short
> >>> name OFL-1.1 in the License field.
> >>>
> >>> - As it isn't among the common-licenses, you need to include the full
> &g
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:27:00PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:45:06AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:40:52PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > From discussion on IRC earlier this evening, it looks like the most
> > &
that this is a somewhat contrived case, but still... wouldn't
it break, or would that be considered a bug in the packages'
dependencies? If the latter, well, wouldn't this leave the maintainer
of foo a bit vulnerable against random decisions by the maintainers of
bar-dev?
G'
;s another
kettle of beer)
So... should Policy 5.2 also list Architecture in the source stanza,
or should #509702 be closed with "unfortunately this is not allowed"? :)
(of course, the former option would be preferable if it actually works :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev
. With time, free1 either stops to provide the needed functionality or
is simply removed; the next version of the package now depends on
free2 | non-free
3. At this point, a user tries to upgrade the original package, but on
her system there is a package that conflicts with free2... the only
choice for APT now is to install the non-free package.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@space.bgr...@ringlet.netr...@freebsd.org
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
because I didn't think of a good beginning of it.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Priority: extra
/usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debiann/control:Priority: extra
/usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debians/control:Priority: extra
[r...@straylight ~]$
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@space.bgr...@ringlet.netr...@freebsd.org
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roa
rver)
Hope that helps!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@space.bgr...@ringlet.netr...@freebsd.org
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
If the meanings of 'true' and 'fa
portable. Generally, it should not be used for new
> +packages. Also note that the wildcards are not expanded
> +then compared, they are simply matched. If
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.netr...@space.bgr...@freebsd.org
PGP key:http://peop
to the *last* item of the text he quoted, not to the whole
portion above it :) Thus, IMHO his first "really needed?" question
referred specifically to the "ordered lists" item, and the "I don't think
they are needed" referred specifically to the "u
vsftpd)
Isn't this one "special"? They do not add a package-specific user,
rather they add a system user with a well-known name to provide
anonymous FTP access in the traditional manner. FWIW, proftpd does
this too, as, I assume, most other FTP daemons would want to.
G
n other
languages - even the documentation of the "noopt" tag says so :)
Keeping the multi-line version allows people to easily adapt it to their
packages.
Thus, it is good to have an example showing how to do it the
if/then/else way, while possibly mentioning the inline version.
G
ariable is deprecated
Just a minor typo note - that ought to be 'substitution' with a 't' :)
> + since dpkg 1.13.19 substitution variable can be
> useful for this purpose.
>
>
Other than that, the patch looks good to me, FWIW :)
G&#
12 matches
Mail list logo
