On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:15:57PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> ~deb+
> Backport to the given (num1) distribution.
^^^
bpo
Regards,
Rene
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:40:32PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:00:28AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > > e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a
> > > > patch
> > > > (or upgrade to a snapsh
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:37:00AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 07:44:11PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a patch
> > (or upgrade to a snapshot) one should do a 1.0+gitYYYDDM
Hi,
I have seen various packages (mostly from the same maintainer, though) which
do branch updates in a imho wrong way.
Updates to a stable branch fixes or backporting fixes is OK. I don't deny
that or so. But the package IMHO should have a correct version then.
e.g. if you have a package 1.0 an
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:49:49AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> process, are a bit of a PITA. They are particularly so for tools who want to
> do
> source code analyses on the code shipped by debian (e.g. the recently started
> DACA project) but, more generally, violate a good faith assumpti
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:33:12PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [java{,2}-compiler]
> - default-jdk. If used in an alternative in Build-Depends{,-Indep} then pick
> one of the options (The Java Team recommends default-jdk).
And what are you going to do as replacement for "whatever Java comp
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> The real problem here is that FTP masters require the list of copyright
> holders to be up-to-date each time the package goes through NEW.
> Whatever justification exists for this requirement, I???m starting to find
> it unaccepta
Hi,
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Some of them: fontconfig-config, blender, openjdk-6-jre,
> openoffice.org-core, vlc. And, as I understand, it leads to 93 bugs of
> "serious" severity and yet another pain for release team.
ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and i
[ Cc' ing dictionaries-common devel list and the Maintainers of
programs using myspell ]
Hi,
me again with more mass-bug-filing potential :)
$ apt-cache show mozilla-browser | grep Provides:
Provides: www-browser, mozilla-1.3
$ apt-cache show mozilla-browser-snapshot | grep Provides:
Provides:
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I am not sure I like #172436.
Hmm. I am beginning to like it
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Hi,
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:40:23PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > [ Cc: ing debian-policy wrt virtual-packages-list ]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We want to suggest Browsers for X (those providing the x-www-browser
> > alternativ
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> x-www-browser isn't listed in virtual-packages-list, though. Maybe it
> should be added. Would make sense IMHO. [ To be consequent,
> text-www-browser would then make sense, too ...]
>
[...]
> So is there a consensus to mass-file bugs to let
[ Cc: ing debian-policy wrt virtual-packages-list ]
Hi,
We want to suggest Browsers for X (those providing the x-www-browser
alternative):
But:
$ grep-available -FProvides x-www-browser | grep Package:
Package: mozilla-firebird
$ grep-available -FProvides www-browser | grep Package:
Package: d
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.0
Severity: wishlist
virtual-package-list.txt.gz says:
"1. Post to debian-devel saying what names you intend to use or what
other changes you wish to make, and file a wish list bug against the
package debian-policy."
Here it is :)
[ sorry for the dupl
Hi,
I forgot that doing before, so forgive me sending this mail now and not
earlier... ;)
"Packages MUST NOT use virtual package names (except privately, amongst
a cooperating group of packages) unless they have been agreed upon and
appear in this list."
OK, as the procedure describes, here I am
15 matches
Mail list logo
