Andrew Pimlott on Mon, Dec 21, 1998 at 12:57:53AM -0500:
> > IMHO, it should be possible to specify a global setting that works
> > with ALL shells. Otherwise, the system administrator has to modify
> > each shell individually.
>
> But as long as we don't have a uniform solution ...
What's wrong
Darren Benham on Sat, Dec 05, 1998 at 08:33:13PM -0800:
> > I just have an observation to make: you guys are getting
> > increasingly *bureaucratized*. Like, massively so. I like all the
> > [...]
>
> It's like auto insurance... most of the time you don't need it.. maybe
> never need it. But wh
I'm not a Debian developer, just a long time lurker.
I just have an observation to make: you guys are getting increasingly
*bureaucratized*. Like, massively so. I like all the principles and
everything but I think all this definition and concretism is just
bloated procedure. Are all these adden
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, Mar 26, 1998 at 12:37:48PM -0800:
> hard links, this is not an issue. This makes hard links more robust and a
> better choice for certian situations. This is why they continue to exist,
> and have not been replaced entirely by symlinks allready.
Hard links are
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 10:37:15PM -0600:
> Who needs to pull up emacs to read info pages? there is a
> stand alone info, which is faster than lynx, and has way
> better search capabilities than either lynx or "less".
Info is better suited for certain i
5 matches
Mail list logo
