Hi,
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 00:05, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> snapshot.d.o also uses sha1 sums, at least internally, but I'd not
> surprised if also for external verification.
At the moment I am trying to focus on contents of .dsc and .changes
only, not the InReleases Packages etc files.
Do
://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/yolo4k/kernels/ubuntu/pool/main/h/hello/hello_2.10-2ubuntu5.dsc
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/699972411/hello_2.10-2ubuntu5_source.changes
Regards,
Dimitri.
>From 95a090af0ced9c04a79da7c006655388fd41a188 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dimitri John Ledkov
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.5.1.0
Severity: minor
At the moment, debian/rules is required to be a Makefile, but it's not
exactly defined. In the absence of an explicit statement it seems most
reasonable that it would be inherited from POSIX, but use of GNU extensions
are liberal even in the
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On 15 May 2016 at 19:49, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Bálint Réczey:
>> Hi,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>
> Hi,
>
>> I think making PIE and bindnow default in dpkg (at least for amd64) would be
>> perfect release goals for Stretch.
>>
>
> I support the end goal, but I suspect we should enable PIE by default
> via GC
On 14 May 2016 at 21:12, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Marco d'Itri:
>> On May 03, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>
>>> While this doesn't make PIC absolutely free, it does eliminate almost
>>> all of the cost, to the point that it no longer seems worthwhile to
>>> build without -fPIC. Apart from that, building
On 30 July 2014 14:08, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:46:18AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> > Bill Allombert writes:
>> > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:10:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> >
>> > >> --- a/polic
On 12 July 2014 19:50, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 09:42:23AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Le Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:46:53PM +0200, Bill Allombert a écrit :
>> >
>> > +
>> > + If your package includes the scripts config.sub and
>> > + config.guess,
On 3 March 2014 13:24, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:46:18AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Bill Allombert writes:
>> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:10:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>
>> >> --- a/policy.sgml
>> >> +++ b/policy.sgml
>> >> @@ -1688,11 +1688,14 @@
>> >>
>> >>
Div0rce isn't aan 0pti0n?u
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13STSR-ziNdpuJ4MPyaTdR15SdDw93lsHxKFZTIbBdhA/edit
-
To stop reuceiving mesusages from us pleasue send an email to oeqz0215 [at]
gmail [dot] com with the worud REMOVE in the suubject line.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
troubleAs obvious profit
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/2514/lpbp7.png
households examines insurance savings risk IV
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:30:59PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> No, I do not believe that. In fact, I have not been able to verify the
> claims John makes on my test system. I have tried reproducing his
> setup in my lab, and the Received headers come out just fine. See my
> messages to
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:53:12PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > The file /etc/mailname is used to form the default host part of e-mail
> > addresses in the From line of various programs. For instance, debchange
> > -i will use it for its changelog m
ot;
test -z "$RUN_package_AT_BOOT" && echo $0 | grep -q '^S' && exit 0
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Dan Jacobson writes:
> Each package that puts a file in /etc/init.d must in its debconf area,
> call [a new debconf element[?]] that will ask the user's wishes as to if
> this package is to be started at boot or not.
And if the package does not use debconf?
--
John Hasler
[E
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:30:10PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> Instead of adjusting this to "48x48" to match current common practise,
> upping it to 128x128 will give us a bit more leeway.
Why not just use SVG and eliminate the whole problem?
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 02:54:43PM -0800, David Starner wrote:
> At 02:32 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> >It's not just physical terminals we're talking about here. We're talking
> >about the vast majority of the state of the art terminal emulators *toda
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 03:50:45PM -0800, David Starner wrote:
> If you're using a terminal that can't support UTF-8, you always have the
> option of running
> something like GNU screen to translate the system charset to the terminal
> charset.
> It seems more important to get a systemwide encodi
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:30:09AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > I like
> > the idea that I can download any old program written in a past
> > decade and just type make.
>
> Yay for broken software.
Unicode did not exist until fairly recently. Lots of useful software was
written prior to its i
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 13:50, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> Sorry, we have to start somewhere. Unicode is the way of the future,
> and if we wait until every vendor of some random terminal updates it
> with support for UTF-8, we will ne
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Then your solution is broken. Seriously, this would be a huge problem
>> for many people.
>
> But the current situation is *already* broken! For example, for a
I don't disagree. I'm saying that your solution is worse than the problem.
> Chinese per
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think that this would be a really bad idea, because it would be a to
>> severe restriction on the set of supported terminal types. Think of
>> remote logins from non-Debian machines: we cannot control the program
>> at the other end of the line. And
,
and the complete lack of problems to users of the software that
an upgrade to the real 4.2 would cause, how difficult would it be
to get the package bumped to 4.2 in the first update to stable?
Are version upgrades in stable against policy or Policy?
--
John R. Daily
johngeekhavoc.com
mentation point would be whether the
virtual package name is shared by a real package.
I understand that that could change over time, however, and thus
perhaps should be excluded.
-John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bianDoc
that we haven't leveraged yet is indexing, which is something
I've sorely missed when looking for information in Policy and the
DDR.
--
John R. Daily
johngeekhavoc.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.1
Severity: normal
This was discussed on the debian-policy mailing list under the
subject "Policy ambiguity regarding control files", first message
2002-05-14. Below is my initial message; note that there is a
relationship between this bug and #131583, since t
At (time_t)1021654369 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> So, each header line is logically a single line, phisically it
> may be broken into multiple lines with leading spaces.
If policy should be changed to allow this for all fields, it may
make sense to simply defer to RFC 822.
-John
e-core
gnome-libs
gnome-print
gtm
happy
libcapplet
libglade2
librep
libsdl-ruby
libsdl1.2
libxml
libxml2
libxslt
libzvt
lirc-xmms-plugin
memprof
pfe
pike
sawfish
scrollkeeper
simgear
snacc
vlc
wine
-John Daily
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ment tools?
If the answer is "Because we don't have the software to do so", I
may be able to help with that soon.
-John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
break.
What is the intended policy?
-John R. Daily
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
th
many purists lamenting the change.
-John
oes not recognize it.
-John Daily
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
an sucks[1], imagine how much more it would
suck if there weren't reasonable standards by which developers
were expected to abide?
-John
[1] Almost by definition, all Linux environments suck. Debian just
sucks less.
ur users' interests first is one of the 5 commitments
we agree to when we become Debian Developers, then what excuse is
there for not mandating debconf?
-John Daily
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey there, I found a great retail site with all kinds of products. Home
decor, office decor, travel, outdoors, kitchen, etc... Take a look around
at http://www.merchandisewholesale.com just click on the images of the
product to enlarge it for a better view.
Sincerely,
John
rd Stallman about this, when I heard he was working
>on GPLv3. He said he'd think about it. Since there is no GPLv3 yet,
>I presume he's still thinking :-)
>
>Richard Braakman
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with a subject of "uns
means 'I should
>read policy'.
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
I can be immature if I want to, because I'm mature enough to make my own
decisions.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
account.
>I'd like to suggest deleting "to root".
>
>
--
I can be immature if I want to, because I'm mature enough to make my own
decisions.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and apt 0.4.
>
>Cheers,
>aj
>
>
--
EMACS == Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
tributors.html
>
>For inclusion in non-free, which is more significant: access to source
>code or 100% FHS compliance?
>
>Thanks,
>
>
--
Customer: "I'm running Windows '98" Tech: "Yes." Customer:
"My computer isn't working now." Tech: "Yes, you said that."
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
plication of High Explosives.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Moshe Zadka wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:46:19 +, "Oliver Elphick" wrote:
>> Moshe Zadka wrote:
>> >OTOH, it bothers me that there are subdirectories under /usr/bin.
>> >E.g.:
>> >Try typing "mh" at the prompt for weird behaviour.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mh
>> b
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, David Schleef wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 08:16:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > Now John, I consider myself fairly competent; however, with three dhcp
> > clients to choose from (an actual situation from many months ago) many
> > folks won'
Again, how about the target audience for a task-*: -user? If it's for Joe
Newbie, wouldn't it be good to get his input before carving something in
stone?
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Chris Waters wrote:
>
> A requirement for discussion on -policy before adding a task package
> might well go a long wa
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, John Galt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > > Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> > > > Another thing that I think is important is that a task should actually
> > > > ha
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> > Another thing that I think is important is that a task should actually
> > have the effect of installing a multitude of packages. If it doesn't,
> > you gain nothing over selecting packages by hand.
>
> No, you gain the ability to sa
I'm going to chime in with my non-DD-ness. ATM the people who decide a
task package are not the ones who will ever use them. Tasks were by
definition not for developers, but for FNGs--DD's should know what they
want. Has anyone gone to -user and ASKED? I would submit that the first
step in ref
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 09:55:20PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> > Do I get to quote Whitman here? "Do I contradict myself, very well then,
> > I contradict myself [I am many, I contain multitudes]" :)
>
> The irony of thi
wrote:
> > > Actually, it does make a difference -- we're not in violation of the
> > > GPL for any instance where we're distributing .debs to users of debian
> > > systems.
>
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 03:53:28PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> > Yeah, bu
On 5 Dec 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay, "you". No sweat off my nose if you wish to exclude me.
>
> Well, I ask because again your motives for posting are unclear.
>
> For all I know, you're
Okay, "you". No sweat off my nose if you wish to exclude me.
On 5 Dec 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Can we really expect others to follow the DFSG when we do so
> > only when convenient?
>
> "w
ld* point out that a *lot* of the software we
> > provide *cannot* be redistributed *unless* you also provide the
> > source. That is, after all, the terms of the GPL, and it clearly
> > doesn't match what you seem to think.
>
> Good idea. [There's a good chance we al
Could we add a home/reference web page to each package?
It would naturally scale with the system.
--
---
John K. Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Those who vote aren't important, those who count the vote matter. J Stalin
the impression which many corporate
people have (incorrectly) that RedHat own the licenses for all the software
they sell.
John Lines
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, John Lines wrote:
> By being the first, and most frequently mentions Free Software license the GPL
Survey says...Bzzzt! The GPL is a latecomer in the free software arena.
> has become the best known. Most authors of free software are not as interested
> in licensi
)
This would free up the FSF lawyers to look at more interesting questions, such
as,
if I am installing 20 servers with RedHat Linux, how many copies do I need to
buy ?
(Note that replies on RedHat licensing are off topic for Debian Policy, so
mail solely on that direct to me only please)
John Lines
On 2 Dec 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > pkg_add -r gcc on a freebsd box will pull down a binary of gcc without a
> > copy of the GPL.
>
> Perhaps I'm confused, but I thought the normal procedure was the
&g
On 2 Dec 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is it? What does Debian have to do with EvilCorp that Red Hat or
> > Slackware doesn't? Why is Debian getting singled out? Why haven't I seen
> > the same thing on
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:54:24AM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:58:36PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> > > > Since when does intenti
On 2 Dec 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > www.ll.georgetown.edu/Fed-Ct/Circuit/fed/opinions/97-1425.html
> >
> > Reasonable man and estoppel are linked, and a choice quote:
> >
> > A delay of more than
On 2 Dec 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > See Wollensak v. Reiher, 115 U.S. 96, 99 (1885). See also USC Title 17,
> > section 507
> >
> > * (b) Civil Actions. - No civil action shall be maintained under the
On 2 Dec 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > First of all, knowledge is not that of the actors, but of the "reasonable
> > man". The .deb archive standard contents were decided on when Debian was
> > still a
On 2 Dec 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Lawyers are involved? This makes it imperitive that no change ever get
> > off the ground ATM. Compromising around a lawyer is like bleeding around
> > a shark: you don'
On 2 Dec 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Widespread ignorance of the law is. Name one binary packaging system that
> > always includes the GPL when necessary. Five years without a correct
> > implementation is evide
stomer: "I'm running Windows '98" Tech: "Yes." Customer:
"My computer isn't working now." Tech: "Yes, you said that."
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
implementation is evidence of widespread ignorance or a changing playing
field, take your choice.
>
--
Customer: "I'm running Windows '98" Tech: "Yes." Customer:
"My computer isn't working now." Tech: "Yes, you said that."
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
sions of the GPL that it finds inconvenient?
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.complete.org
Sr. Software Developer, Progeny Linux Systems, Inc.www.progenylinux.com
#include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ware patent issue instead of a
copyright issue, 2/3 of the lifespan of the patent would've passed without
action by the holder. Most courts would laugh at the idea of allowing
injunctive relief in this situation.
--
void hamlet()
{#define question=((bb)||(!bb))}
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED] that's who!
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:26:22PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> > >
> > > > In the Real-World application, though, installing 300+ copies of the GPL
> > > > is absurd, and, quite frankly, a waste of space. Which se
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Customer: "I'm running Windows '98" Tech: "Yes." Customer:
"My computer isn't working now." Tech: "Yes, you said that."
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
bstantial size for
a non-technically derived fix, is it?
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Customer: "I'm running Windows '98" Tech: "Y
of us with low drive space, violating DFSG 5, and discriminate
against making a small footprint distribution, violating DFSG 6. The
cat's out of the bag on DFSG 8 ATM, and there's no way it's going back in.
--
FINE, I take it back: UNfuck you!
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
> install it unless it isn't installed already.
>
> The famous dpkg-needs-metadata-per-file thing..
>
> Wichert.
>
>
--
FINE, I take it back: UNfuck you!
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
to log the output of an
external program. Requiring dpkg-log prevents that.
-- John
ained one of the ones which could be leveraged to obtain all privileges.
I used to regard the levels of privilege as being similar to the safety catch
on
a gun. It does not provide you with much protection if someone takes control of
the gun away from you, but it will stop you shooting yourself in the foot.
John Lines
ng of what
configuration files the package uses (and where they are), and where it
stores data (i.e., does it use space in /var) would be a big help.
John Ackermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
John Ackermann N8UR
Dayton, Ohio, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.febo.com
-BEGIN PGP PUBL
anoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>"John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> I know there is a www-data policy somewhere, but I can't seem to find
> John> it in any policy document. Can someone tell me where to look?
Hi,
I know there is a www-data policy somewhere, but I can't seem to find
it in any policy document. Can someone tell me where to look?
Thanks,
John
=-===-==---=--=---'
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.complete.org
Sr. Software Developer, Progeny Linux Systems, Inc.www.progenylinux.com
#include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.
-- John
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John,
>
> You originally proposed the following amendment to policy:
>
> There is no mention of the UUCP-style locking required for serial
> lines to prevent multiple communications programs from attempting to
>
c.gov,
typical bureaucratic garbage, I'm guessing (but a PITA to hand paste--#$%^
synaptics touchpads...).
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 07:46:11PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> > Has anyone submitted the non-US tree to Treasury so that it can be
>
Has anyone submitted the non-US tree to Treasury so that it can be
reviewed and exported legally? Unless somebody's done that, the current
export control laws still prevent export of it...They've been LOOSENED,
not eliminated.
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > Ok, nothing illegal ab
he package, presumably
with the correct owner and permissions without my having to do as much
administrative work, but I can appreciate that other people may have different
requirements.
John Lines
My personal opinion is that this would not really serve our goals to
promote Free Software. A better solution for us, in general, is to
educate the PHBs.
I'll supply the cattle prod if you supply the power stapler. :-)
-- John
Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My compan
onsider, or - if they
really have thought of a better way to do things - have the policy changed
so that everyone else can benefit from their brilliance.
John Lines
the Debian userspace to other kernels. A
license that restricts architectural ports is unequivocally foolish, one
that restricts kernel ports is often perceived as less foolish, though
IMHO it's just as foolish.
On 17 Dec 1999, Henning Makholm wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
> --force-legal to override.
>
> You could even get rid of non-free this way. Or am I being too ambitious
> here ?
Yes
John Lines
. Anything beyond that should be asked
> for.
No, this is silly. When you install a package, it is for use. If you
don't intend to use it, why install it?
Incidentally, can we do something about the insane CC line please?
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting & programming
a convenient place to put
a flag which says 'ask me (the user) before enabling any daemons'
John Lines
ly want to run these libraries at runtime, i.e.
some graphics viewer needs libjpeg62, but they do not want to compile or
develop with this libraray and so they don't want the devel stuff... does it
sound sensible?
--
John Travers
"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exist
the adoption of Debian (or linux)
a much more attractive proposition. This may eventually help lead more
quickly to the adoption of an open word processing standard.
--
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
very
difficult). Working with my g-friend under a dead-line, we have
occaisionally had been forced to boot win98. But this is only a side
issue...
--
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
would just take a while
for the distribution to come into line with policy; this is normal.
--
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
is scenario
> really do anything for free software? You're allowed to eat, but not to
> cook. This shackles you to the restauranteurs.
>
--
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
I would say that if we are going to be putting effort into something,
that the effort be put into code audit instead of StackGuard. That
would be more likely to find and fix problems, and would not be so
restricted in scope.
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting & programming [EMAIL P
full
implementation of the client library; ie, xfree86.
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting & programming [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade) www.debian.org |
+
The 954,963rd digit of pi is 3.
ource code, and you should have all you need to
write something to communicate with it from the other end.
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting & programming [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Fre
tment of packages. Presumably you
and the other ftpmasters are abiding by the same set of policy
guidelines; therefore presumably there exists a discrepancy in the
interpretation or else this is an isolated incident from the others.
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting & programming [EMAIL
x27;t mean that netcat as a SMTP
server is devoid of use. It means simply that your needs are
different than mine. I do not try to force my needs on you; please
reciprocate in kind.
-- John
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting & programming [EMAIL
ill be has a free server available: netcat. This renders
other distinctions meaningless, I think.
There's nothing to stop me from typing TCP/IP stuff to it. In fact, I do
this with the SMTP protocol from both ends on a fairly regular basis.
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting &am
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
