Luis Francisco Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The question is what should I do. AFAIK, /etc/shells is used to determine
> which shells can be used with chsh. I am not aware of any other use. I think
> it makes perfect sense that shells (un)register themselves in that file upon
> installati
Hi,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Luis" == Luis Francisco Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Luis> there is an "oldish" bug report open on tcsh that complains
> Luis> about tcsh not deleting it's own entry from /etc/shells upon
> Luis> removal from the system.
>
> Since that file b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Manoj Srivastava) wrote on 18.09.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> __
> If two or more packages use the same configuration file, one of these
> packages has to be defined as *owner* of the configuration fi
Hi,
>>"Luis" == Luis Francisco Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Luis> there is an "oldish" bug report open on tcsh that complains
Luis> about tcsh not deleting it's own entry from /etc/shells upon
Luis> removal from the system.
Since that file belongs to another package, and shells
[I am CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I am not sure if the maintainer
is subscribed to debian-policy]
Hi,
there is an "oldish" bug report open on tcsh that complains about tcsh not
deleting it's own entry from /etc/shells upon removal from the system.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/16/16072.html
Now,
5 matches
Mail list logo