Re: [Manoj Srivastava] [PATCH 2/4] [bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file

2009-10-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, Oct 13 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:15:04PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 13 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: >> >> > Well I will do that, but first, I like to be remembered why the old >> > policy-process document has been removed. >> >> W

Re: [Manoj Srivastava] [PATCH 2/4] [bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file

2009-10-13 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:15:04PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Well I will do that, but first, I like to be remembered why the old > > policy-process document has been removed. > > Well, because it had become obsolete at the time it w

Re: [Manoj Srivastava] [PATCH 2/4] [bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file

2009-10-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, Oct 13 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:23:29AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 11 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: >> >> > Manoj Srivastava writes: >> > >> >> But someone really should be writing this up, since the bug >> >> report was, in my opin

Re: [Manoj Srivastava] [PATCH 2/4] [bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file

2009-10-13 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:23:29AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > Manoj Srivastava writes: > > > >> But someone really should be writing this up, since the bug > >> report was, in my opinion, on point: this stuff needs to be written up, >

Re: [Manoj Srivastava] [PATCH 2/4] [bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file

2009-10-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Oct 11 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: > Manoj Srivastava writes: > >> But someone really should be writing this up, since the bug >> report was, in my opinion, on point: this stuff needs to be written up, >> and I think that the wiki stuff is already not as good as the README is >>

Re: [Manoj Srivastava] [PATCH 2/4] [bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file

2009-10-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava writes: > But someone really should be writing this up, since the bug > report was, in my opinion, on point: this stuff needs to be written up, > and I think that the wiki stuff is already not as good as the README is > when it comes to git process (far too many needle

Re: [Manoj Srivastava] [PATCH 2/4] [bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file

2009-10-05 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Oct 05 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 03:05:42PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 05 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:36:44AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I have now updated the README docs

Re: [Manoj Srivastava] [PATCH 2/4] [bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file

2009-10-05 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 03:05:42PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:36:44AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have now updated the README docs with a slightly cleaner > >> work-flow. I would lik

[Manoj Srivastava] [PATCH 2/4] [bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file

2009-10-05 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Oct 05 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:36:44AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have now updated the README docs with a slightly cleaner >> work-flow. I would like to get a show of hands from the policy team >> about this; and if people are